From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ECD4C433FE for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2022 14:22:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234788AbiDFOYh (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Apr 2022 10:24:37 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50810 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234915AbiDFOYS (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Apr 2022 10:24:18 -0400 Received: from mail-oi1-x229.google.com (mail-oi1-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::229]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E88AE21A889; Tue, 5 Apr 2022 21:00:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-oi1-x229.google.com with SMTP id i7so1213426oie.7; Tue, 05 Apr 2022 21:00:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=sender:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=RNgdmhlHV2YaSa/8H1LqQR7tgjnE4yKMr+9iZaYLTy0=; b=CNXSfdN0vlC+dcxnEiGotzlyZ3nX8n5QmGM4NQ1xPcl+h6NXek2ZH1Iz7i/G/wcHTg DKcedZk24zwH4K2CpZDUhNCVAfNtnML3GDWIeRuzZHhk7fTC5LHms+MYfmaLFZt3GSiO zw6In0OYiewjcP6bE5VGN1rQA4U2jE9Tm2tCmG80P65W59aNvXXpCIRa3UPHmTFQ6qxt wrcpwI+Z7P3PKYWeVCWPXG+ABXiVTIxU1IRL0tkxKIMK/eA57xnhhtUODrU90TIybiHQ kffSrPedlRQHjTBfbIEkc1RNpvrSNQgPzqMbi+LZ2ju46ijSxEFnDiJbBG0H1k9Z1UhP 7y6A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent :subject:content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=RNgdmhlHV2YaSa/8H1LqQR7tgjnE4yKMr+9iZaYLTy0=; b=OPStaCFapyNlQCD11hq3ANJJiWJb7n7uJS/VIH+CcxsqTxu8EKCyb6Kugemh7ifGxU QFXCTU+oKcF2jeElZ+YBlx3m0dkvcyIKhsRih7NZof5SpGdRwJzdTTx2oUPvpjdzV8r5 1b2do2EC35uNrZaeXhbY7R1SB76Ee/DgXCWkH1QJFi0ybOeTAE2JTlzTUbTiAAfaEyyo a0haQqn4Rw0yDiZHuw76orXlyRV32WTdxvt1JbnhV56myHHhdVJ2WeWb06UC44U+XshZ Fya9LEVnCepCAi56FJwnWewFYpylDiBOh8zCLcgfe2oZVZJVU3rEcDz659xJAZAm3S9r b84g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533MqO/BuGHjmTcwSDSRph/3VN4lw/QX7JrrPv9sbtyul8p4GoIQ PdCrYNeD/AAu46SdvKica10= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwBP63iKmYCkyaS8cxnP7aItx5dZ69nnJCiisBuK5RtmB5pZuoUHTSPJMwn0czM4ZAFOlGMZg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:ab1:b0:2ec:a6fa:7251 with SMTP id r17-20020a0568080ab100b002eca6fa7251mr2709381oij.180.1649217613364; Tue, 05 Apr 2022 21:00:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2600:1700:e321:62f0:329c:23ff:fee3:9d7c? ([2600:1700:e321:62f0:329c:23ff:fee3:9d7c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w22-20020acaad16000000b002d9c98e551bsm5926097oie.36.2022.04.05.21.00.11 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 05 Apr 2022 21:00:12 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Guenter Roeck Message-ID: <074eef95-05b5-1e29-32ed-c2fe13d88c1d@roeck-us.net> Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2022 21:00:10 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.7.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/599] 5.10.110-rc1 review Content-Language: en-US To: Steven Rostedt Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, slade@sladewatkins.com, Sasha Levin References: <20220405070258.802373272@linuxfoundation.org> <20220406010749.GA1133386@roeck-us.net> <20220406023025.GA1926389@roeck-us.net> <20220405225212.061852f9@gandalf.local.home> <20220405230812.2feca4ed@gandalf.local.home> <20220405232413.6b38e966@gandalf.local.home> From: Guenter Roeck In-Reply-To: <20220405232413.6b38e966@gandalf.local.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 4/5/22 20:24, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Tue, 5 Apr 2022 23:08:12 -0400 > Steven Rostedt wrote: > >> Here's a thought, if you decide to backport a patch to stable, and you see >> that there's another commit with a "Fixes" tag to the automatically >> selected commit. DO NOT BACKPORT IF THE FIXES PATCH FAILS TO GO BACK TOO! > > Seriously. This should be the case for *all* backported patches, not just > the AUTOSEL ones. > > Otherwise you are backporting a commit to "stable" that is KNOWN TO BE > BROKEN! > Agreed. Guenter