linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hayes Wang <hayeswang@realtek.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: nic_swsd <nic_swsd@realtek.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next] r8152: divide the tx and rx bottom functions
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2019 10:04:58 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0835B3720019904CB8F7AA43166CEEB2F18D4837@RTITMBSVM03.realtek.com.tw> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a262d73b-0e91-7610-c88f-9670cc6fd18d@gmail.com>

Eric Dumazet [mailto:eric.dumazet@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, August 16, 2019 5:27 PM
[...]
> Maybe you would avoid messing with a tasklet (we really try to get rid
> of tasklets in general) using two NAPI, one for TX, one for RX.
> 
> Some drivers already use two NAPI, it is fine.
> 
> This might avoid the ugly dance in r8152_poll(),
> calling napi_schedule(napi) after napi_complete_done() !

The reason is that the USB device couldn't control
the interrupt of USB controller. That is, I couldn't
disable the interrupt before napi_schedule and
enable it after napi_complete_done. If the callback
function occurs during the following timing, it is
possible no one would schedule the napi again.

static int r8152_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
{
	struct r8152 *tp = container_of(napi, struct r8152, napi);
	int work_done;

	work_done = rx_bottom(tp, budget);
	bottom_half(tp);

	--> callback occurs here and try to call napi_schedule

	napi_complete_done(napi, work_done)

That is, no tx or rx could be handled unless
something trigger napi_schedule.


Best Regards,
Hayes




  reply	other threads:[~2019-08-16 10:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-14  8:30 [PATCH net-next] r8152: divide the tx and rx bottom functions Hayes Wang
2019-08-15 20:58 ` David Miller
2019-08-16  2:59   ` Hayes Wang
2019-08-16  5:17     ` David Miller
2019-08-16  6:39 ` Eric Dumazet
2019-08-16  8:10   ` Hayes Wang
2019-08-16  8:19     ` Eric Dumazet
2019-08-16  9:08       ` Hayes Wang
2019-08-16  9:27         ` Eric Dumazet
2019-08-16 10:04           ` Hayes Wang [this message]
2019-08-19  6:40 ` [PATCH net-next v2] " Hayes Wang
2019-08-20 19:19   ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0835B3720019904CB8F7AA43166CEEB2F18D4837@RTITMBSVM03.realtek.com.tw \
    --to=hayeswang@realtek.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nic_swsd@realtek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).