From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751121AbcFXLdJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jun 2016 07:33:09 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:54206 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750951AbcFXLdH (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jun 2016 07:33:07 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/27] [AARCH64] Fix utmp struct for compatibility reasons. To: Yury Norov , Andreas Schwab References: <1466485631-3532-1-git-send-email-ynorov@caviumnetworks.com> <1466485631-3532-2-git-send-email-ynorov@caviumnetworks.com> <5769139E.7020805@arm.com> <20160623043542.GA13449@yury-N73SV> <20160623073607.GA21325@yury-N73SV> Cc: Andrew Pinski , Szabolcs Nagy , GNU C Library , LKML , nd , Arnd Bergmann , Catalin Marinas , Marcus Shawcroft , philb@gnu.org, David Miller , Maxim Kuvyrkov , "Joseph S. Myers" , Andrew Pinski From: Florian Weimer Message-ID: <08fe906c-56a4-abca-2587-36128ce48167@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 13:33:02 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160623073607.GA21325@yury-N73SV> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.31]); Fri, 24 Jun 2016 11:33:07 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 06/23/2016 09:36 AM, Yury Norov wrote: > On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 09:32:46AM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote: >> Andrew Pinski writes: >> >>> So if you want aarch64 to be compatible with aarch32, you need to >>> define __WORDSIZE_TIME64_COMPAT32. If we don't want aarch64 and >>> aarch32 to be compatible at all, then we can drop this patch or if you >>> don't want LP64 and ILP32 to be compatible either. >> >> Or go the other way like s390 and use the LP64 layout for ILP32. >> >> Andreas. >> >> -- >> Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab@suse.de >> GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7 >> "And now for something completely different." > > It was an agreement that we don't fix Y2038 issues specifically, as > there will be general fix. As far as I understand this, it is not a Y2038 issue because it affects current systems using current dates. It's a separate bug IMHO. Florian