From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753655AbcIBLSz (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Sep 2016 07:18:55 -0400 Received: from devils.ext.ti.com ([198.47.26.153]:36272 "EHLO devils.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752708AbcIBLSx (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Sep 2016 07:18:53 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: am57xx-beagle-x15: Add support for rev B1 To: Sekhar Nori , Nishanth Menon , Tony Lindgren References: <20160902090600.27262-1-nm@ti.com> <20160902090600.27262-3-nm@ti.com> CC: Kishon Vijay Abraham I , , , , , Robert Nelson From: Tomi Valkeinen Message-ID: <0927d74a-17cf-dc4e-081d-b27c3bf5ac3c@ti.com> Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2016 14:18:23 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="QchJO620jlSNBAOK8iE20ugCN9OltxFGR" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --QchJO620jlSNBAOK8iE20ugCN9OltxFGR Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="U1fFk2kO4NfpDmbpHoxvi3opXx36nhGV4"; protected-headers="v1" From: Tomi Valkeinen To: Sekhar Nori , Nishanth Menon , Tony Lindgren Cc: Kishon Vijay Abraham I , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Robert Nelson Message-ID: <0927d74a-17cf-dc4e-081d-b27c3bf5ac3c@ti.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: am57xx-beagle-x15: Add support for rev B1 References: <20160902090600.27262-1-nm@ti.com> <20160902090600.27262-3-nm@ti.com> In-Reply-To: --U1fFk2kO4NfpDmbpHoxvi3opXx36nhGV4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 02/09/16 13:41, Sekhar Nori wrote: > Also, how about renaming the existing dts to am57xx-beagle-x15-reva2.dt= s > and let the production version be called am57xx-beagle-x15.dts? Surely > this will cause some inconvenience to A2 users. But there are few users= > of those and it might be more intuitive for the majority users if the > file for production version is without a specific version string > attached. Just a thought though, not sure about it myself either. I was about to suggest the same, so yes, this sounds good to me. Tomi --U1fFk2kO4NfpDmbpHoxvi3opXx36nhGV4-- --QchJO620jlSNBAOK8iE20ugCN9OltxFGR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJXyV//AAoJEPo9qoy8lh71eQ0QAK+iWuJWwbMiPVk64eMplVes O3cEY9kk67C9vuWD9CHHJ+MvSgT5nXphLRz7q1qjE5lulmk+srQPWQp57kB6EvIu 0UYMM5twpBS69Gc8hviOLVpzzxmA2fTgtCx/ionpg0ETeltmrIdnj7TH5RHOJGwG Pn5ABCK6GZCaSP1epNUxo3r/ExYthVf4KJFkm00wKAabL7b59QqNB6hbPLkdu4tA wQHwqLqjC9NRwKtVzLiAYC1YyX60oH++G/BvDDpuDrVjChDubpVsNerpK7uKNgY1 NiJsjw1ynGBWofSRKjv92WI2tBGRnKiRi5aMaDBZZ1MtJIRLtTcDhlsxvUjGy4am qVDraecjNe/6cBtGzAYBRwskzIv4z5Ko4bo6tkpy5jxE7cysPFNePQNXFHaqc4m7 7DHOf6UCOzl50wPDWydsfaOW9sRdPUqWuFWRy/rRrxTHgYchO6CH4xYeT/WwyaRQ /ddlqsyeT9aWUOI/oQ4N3HQqNEfBLefo3uKsLfxcJyt0yvWKY8LofpL1pYs4uNc+ BBXhNPCUfsk2+Q3QM5jVn2vMwB5hhQYOcOkECbcxHZYRjtd7p9rqQ5J93sYMI+2v PWWn+FX4C3AQ87WBJwNu8nl+PWcjjjnYyllbDZP0ehD3fqBDZSAo4JdOhkbhSIKD ZNcm+y+QMKAVaNmU+gRg =kDd7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --QchJO620jlSNBAOK8iE20ugCN9OltxFGR--