From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBF3FC388CF for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 19:18:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9073422274 for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 19:18:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=hansenpartnership.com header.i=@hansenpartnership.com header.b="WcP5INjn"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=hansenpartnership.com header.i=@hansenpartnership.com header.b="WcP5INjn" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727246AbgJRTSF (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Oct 2020 15:18:05 -0400 Received: from bedivere.hansenpartnership.com ([96.44.175.130]:38858 "EHLO bedivere.hansenpartnership.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726249AbgJRTSD (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Oct 2020 15:18:03 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bedivere.hansenpartnership.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A1D5128046A; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 12:18:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=hansenpartnership.com; s=20151216; t=1603048682; bh=aTHhEGSm6DrUFNt/hKuOWL0f+WzaMvx/rc4IP5RJYRs=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=WcP5INjnqihCMCJ+2ZkHdzEWBsqi3wavZOcf0NGlcoun37UNiQ4GoZk+2AoMrr8hd 1s2t7Y8IzQcDUGm581+QcIuy/enpzpZm6HswhyX4zoKl9l3S5fk96frr/LU4I9kVw8 r8s7AtR/5wOGbwEsua/QdQrVgo3j6VSqYIXYukhg= Received: from bedivere.hansenpartnership.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bedivere.hansenpartnership.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ywWMwLsGscQI; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 12:18:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jarvis.int.hansenpartnership.com (unknown [IPv6:2601:600:8280:66d1::c447]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bedivere.hansenpartnership.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 340C31280456; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 12:18:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=hansenpartnership.com; s=20151216; t=1603048682; bh=aTHhEGSm6DrUFNt/hKuOWL0f+WzaMvx/rc4IP5RJYRs=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=WcP5INjnqihCMCJ+2ZkHdzEWBsqi3wavZOcf0NGlcoun37UNiQ4GoZk+2AoMrr8hd 1s2t7Y8IzQcDUGm581+QcIuy/enpzpZm6HswhyX4zoKl9l3S5fk96frr/LU4I9kVw8 r8s7AtR/5wOGbwEsua/QdQrVgo3j6VSqYIXYukhg= Message-ID: <0a739bcd421a3154c2521b49779b287e6c0d08a2.camel@HansenPartnership.com> Subject: Re: [Ocfs2-devel] [RFC] treewide: cleanup unreachable breaks From: James Bottomley To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: trix@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org, storagedev@microchip.com, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, ath10k@lists.infradead.org, MPT-FusionLinux.pdl@broadcom.com, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, usb-storage@lists.one-eyed-alien.net, linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, industrypack-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfc@lists.01.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-can@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, patches@opensource.cirrus.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org, ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com, linux-power@fi.rohmeurope.com Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2020 12:17:59 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20201018191618.GO20115@casper.infradead.org> References: <20201017160928.12698-1-trix@redhat.com> <20201018185943.GM20115@casper.infradead.org> <45efa7780c79972eae9ca9bdeb9f7edbab4f3643.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <20201018191618.GO20115@casper.infradead.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 2020-10-18 at 20:16 +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Sun, Oct 18, 2020 at 12:13:35PM -0700, James Bottomley wrote: > > On Sun, 2020-10-18 at 19:59 +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > > On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 09:09:28AM -0700, trix@redhat.com wrote: > > > > clang has a number of useful, new warnings see > > > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://clang.llvm.org/docs/DiagnosticsReference.html__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!Krxz78O3RKcB9JBMVo_F98FupVhj_jxX60ddN6tKGEbv_cnooXc1nnBmchm-e_O9ieGnyQ$ > > > > > > Please get your IT department to remove that stupidity. If you > > > can't, please send email from a non-Red Hat email address. > > > > Actually, the problem is at Oracle's end somewhere in the ocfs2 > > list ... if you could fix it, that would be great. The usual real > > mailing lists didn't get this transformation > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201017160928.12698-1-trix@redhat.com/ > > > > but the ocfs2 list archive did: > > > > https://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/ocfs2-devel/2020-October/015330.html > > > > I bet Oracle IT has put some spam filter on the list that mangles > > URLs this way. > > *sigh*. I'm sure there's a way. I've raised it with someone who > should be able to fix it. As someone who works for IBM I can only say I feel your pain ... James