Re: [PATCH v3] exfat: remove EXFAT_SB_DIRTY flag

[Tetsuhiro Kohada <kohada.t2@gmail.com>]

>> I mentioned rmdir as an example.
>> However, this problem is not only with rmdirs.
>> VOL_DIRTY remains when some functions abort with an error.
>> In original, VOL_DIRTY is not cleared even if performe 'sync'.
>> With this patch, it ensures that VOL_DIRTY will be cleared by 'sync'.
>>
>> Is my description insufficient?
> 
> I understood what you said. However, it is a natural result
> when deleting the related code with EXFAT_SB_DIRTY flag.
> 
> So I thought it would be better to separate it into new problems
> related to VOL_DIRTY-set under not real errors.

I see.
It seems that it is better to consider separately when consistency is corrupted and when it is kept.

>> BTW
>> Even with this patch applied,  VOL_DIRTY remains until synced in the above
>> case.
>> It's not  easy to reproduce as rmdir, but I'll try to fix it in the future.
> 
> I think it's not a problem not to clear VOL_DIRTY under real errors,
> because VOL_DIRTY is just like a hint to note that write was not finished clearly.
> 
> If you mean there are more situation like ENOTEMPTY you mentioned,
> please make new patch to fix them.

Hmm.
VOL_DIRTY is easily cleared by another write operation.
For that purpose, I think MediaFailure is more appropriate.

BR
---
Tetsuhiro Kohada <kohada.t2@gmail.com>