From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752817AbcIFOVn (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Sep 2016 10:21:43 -0400 Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.4]:54014 "EHLO mout.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756107AbcIFOVl (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Sep 2016 10:21:41 -0400 Subject: Re: ACPI-APEI-HEST: Fine-tuning for three function implementations To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" References: <566ABCD9.1060404@users.sourceforge.net> <9834b713-2c7b-ad6d-76a5-b1db40f561fc@users.sourceforge.net> <06ab72bc-6e00-1829-f1bf-67f0a31aff38@users.sourceforge.net> Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Len Brown , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, trivial@kernel.org, Julia Lawall , Paolo Bonzini From: SF Markus Elfring Message-ID: <0b722fa0-6bb3-812f-66ce-8db3b91ed107@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2016 16:21:13 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:QWxPd6G8WAXbOQ87M3LIFIn+FftHPDXOg9wy2lmUKFJ0BiQjvOq fc556XVcOjE52JGqQkWo0Fcfeeq6QEM3EKhDbp4PgYjAc1fkA5Ilp0CsDvcvwR9eL2n36jN JCveMOmHgVb9kADAuXenpon86LTMvkKkzOPdliW2Ul9xpQi9dwC6akJe41ji/Jk+s4bl/0+ EV5MW2VNwpXCa6s2O/OOw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:hws81/BvwcA=:fztoIf+lAI51KxaKTGqUnf SUDl0VymDDQ1wkwRYrM72tddagqDcU+uq//EN46DaINRycLCZDdqkVM1qs+fUI4UTAkb2hkfM FwnkbKpdJkOoGdaTvZNYwpXIr3d8hegoolaFFQ/nD5Fxlbec0rEsMEGqF9g7gIhSPqXlT64c7 jxIgskYQxRj9RXZzgP26tZPeFoVHesUaUDcxhi6TfpGj3D5G0njMsUamDxUGVApHpZdZ4G56H kYZ0qVF7E5NH6oEgoQ+46/lOyv7E593DTmnjHUYo2KvdNqpAuazg6wfrG1X72wV5QVZOc6wKi 6qDjvfJh/Yl3ouDdIvSN0tAJqBVSOQ8+PTpiIPzBGC01K9wYEAWuR7MCrXrSL4P3enHQ5LB5k ooVqo6prDgk1rASbBjVa91q1rpk8LoBBzecenv2wYREII7stXqBFMwEWkKCp8cUk9qRL8BsVj K6MS9YqT15c6uLnDt4DGUm4OPGh5ioAbN2m2MY6lrxUiQl2SVsjBA7Y+cGI6FfZTb9PQf8Cie Pm43RIUrUYIs0n0TIW89F4WVc3DAQ/q1T2VqsY52/HdAxr9xdEU7VGdyZXTq7JObP9V7r4Qkq odv3o51Nlu9Dfs5C0IOj06fwM8C32kuICc+bn8vjb2T1CEVoDMb5b7LgYVkJDiyIfvPeKxrcj x0gu/uLwFBoAtk9j+u50iHgeC/buMbW/V+JYJgjpjA7Nf6xmH0g7aa2K9EdrHgJ01CDiLDK09 ZwLI71q3HSgs4wJZjcPEe2wVCQwXnnswO/ZC4er6KsN6wsg+d6R9/8tmFVyDUwMulPHNbm72b URaqufF Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Well, as I said elsewhere, if you make the same type of change in > multiple places in one piece of code (or code maintained by the same maintainer), I can imagine that my update suggestions will also trigger some additional development efforts. I assume that some contributors appreciate fine-grained patch series, don't they? > you make it easier to review those changes if they go in one patch. It might look convenient. But I find that there are more aspects to consider for a better patch granularity. Regards, Markus