linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Topi Miettinen <toiwoton@gmail.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>
Cc: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:FILESYSTEMS (VFS and infrastructure)" 
	<linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Allow restricting permissions in /proc/sys
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2019 12:52:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0ba24187-caf6-c851-baaa-f768885cda47@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrUEQMdugz1t6HfK5MvDq_kOw13yuF+98euqVJgZ4WR1VA@mail.gmail.com>

On 13.11.2019 6.50, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 3:22 PM Christian Brauner
> <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com> wrote:
>>
>> [Cc+ linux-api@vger.kernel.org]
>>
>> since that's potentially relevant to quite a few people.
>>
>> On Sun, Nov 03, 2019 at 04:55:48PM +0200, Topi Miettinen wrote:
>>> Several items in /proc/sys need not be accessible to unprivileged
>>> tasks. Let the system administrator change the permissions, but only
>>> to more restrictive modes than what the sysctl tables allow.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Topi Miettinen <toiwoton@gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>>   fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>>>   1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c b/fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c
>>> index d80989b6c344..88c4ca7d2782 100644
>>> --- a/fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c
>>> +++ b/fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c
>>> @@ -818,6 +818,10 @@ static int proc_sys_permission(struct inode *inode, int
>>> mask)
>>>          if ((mask & MAY_EXEC) && S_ISREG(inode->i_mode))
>>>                  return -EACCES;
>>>
>>> +       error = generic_permission(inode, mask);
>>> +       if (error)
>>> +               return error;
>>> +
>>>          head = grab_header(inode);
>>>          if (IS_ERR(head))
>>>                  return PTR_ERR(head);
>>> @@ -837,9 +841,35 @@ static int proc_sys_setattr(struct dentry *dentry,
>>> struct iattr *attr)
>>>          struct inode *inode = d_inode(dentry);
>>>          int error;
>>>
>>> -       if (attr->ia_valid & (ATTR_MODE | ATTR_UID | ATTR_GID))
>>> +       if (attr->ia_valid & (ATTR_UID | ATTR_GID))
>>>                  return -EPERM;
> 
> Supporting at least ATTR_GID would make this much more useful.

Yes, also XATTR/ACL support would be useful. But so far I've tried to 
allow only tightening of permissions.

>>>
>>> +       if (attr->ia_valid & ATTR_MODE) {
>>> +               struct ctl_table_header *head = grab_header(inode);
>>> +               struct ctl_table *table = PROC_I(inode)->sysctl_entry;
>>> +               umode_t max_mode = 0777; /* Only these bits may change */
>>> +
>>> +               if (IS_ERR(head))
>>> +                       return PTR_ERR(head);
>>> +
>>> +               if (!table) /* global root - r-xr-xr-x */
>>> +                       max_mode &= ~0222;
>>> +               else /*
>>> +                     * Don't allow permissions to become less
>>> +                     * restrictive than the sysctl table entry
>>> +                     */
>>> +                       max_mode &= table->mode;
> 
> Style nit: please put braces around multi-line if and else branches,
> even if they're only multi-line because of comments.

OK, thanks.

>>> +
>>> +               sysctl_head_finish(head);
>>> +
>>> +               /* Execute bits only allowed for directories */
>>> +               if (!S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode))
>>> +                       max_mode &= ~0111;
> 
> Why is this needed?
> 

In general, /proc/sys does not allow executable permissions for the 
files, so I've continued this policy.

-Topi

  reply	other threads:[~2019-11-13 10:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-03 14:55 [PATCH] Allow restricting permissions in /proc/sys Topi Miettinen
2019-11-03 17:56 ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2019-11-03 19:24   ` Topi Miettinen
2019-11-12 23:15   ` Kees Cook
2019-11-03 18:50 ` Eric W. Biederman
2019-11-03 19:38   ` Topi Miettinen
2019-11-04 15:44     ` Eric W. Biederman
2019-11-04 17:58       ` Topi Miettinen
2019-11-04 23:41         ` Eric W. Biederman
2019-11-05  7:35           ` Topi Miettinen
2019-11-12 23:19             ` Kees Cook
2019-11-13  1:04               ` Luis Chamberlain
2019-11-12 23:22 ` Christian Brauner
2019-11-13  4:50   ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-11-13 10:52     ` Topi Miettinen [this message]
2019-11-13 16:00   ` Jann Horn
2019-11-13 16:19     ` Topi Miettinen
2019-11-13 16:40       ` Jann Horn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0ba24187-caf6-c851-baaa-f768885cda47@gmail.com \
    --to=toiwoton@gmail.com \
    --cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=christian.brauner@ubuntu.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).