From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754221Ab0LHRIK (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Dec 2010 12:08:10 -0500 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:25187 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752460Ab0LHRIJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Dec 2010 12:08:09 -0500 Message-Id: <0d30dc$kddq6q@orsmga001.jf.intel.com> X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.59,316,1288594800"; d="scan'208";a="685172954" Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 17:08:04 +0000 To: Florian Mickler , Keith Packard Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm: record monitor status in output_poll_execute Cc: Dave Airlie , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org In-Reply-To: <20101208173424.76ec4041@schatten.dmk.lab> References: <1290797159-3977-1-git-send-email-keithp@keithp.com> <1290797159-3977-2-git-send-email-keithp@keithp.com> <20101205132743.3b3458ab@schatten.dmk.lab> <20101208173424.76ec4041@schatten.dmk.lab> From: Chris Wilson Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 8 Dec 2010 17:34:24 +0100, Florian Mickler wrote: > Does that mean that the kernel regression will not be > fixed/worked-around for old userspace? I think there is some confusion in that I believe there is more than one backlight bug at play here. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre