From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C35B2C43143 for ; Mon, 1 Oct 2018 12:19:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 882D4208D9 for ; Mon, 1 Oct 2018 12:19:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=rasmusvillemoes.dk header.i=@rasmusvillemoes.dk header.b="cIRkRGPX" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 882D4208D9 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=rasmusvillemoes.dk Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729380AbeJAS4v (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Oct 2018 14:56:51 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-f67.google.com ([209.85.208.67]:43068 "EHLO mail-ed1-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729363AbeJAS4u (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Oct 2018 14:56:50 -0400 Received: by mail-ed1-f67.google.com with SMTP id a4-v6so123752eds.10 for ; Mon, 01 Oct 2018 05:19:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rasmusvillemoes.dk; s=google; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=E41UMtMQq9iPtauKHLfE4KgGHiN671APeZaC9H2EG7w=; b=cIRkRGPXdzMJ6YWtYmFXLzHmGNpFhqNnF69GmSmXZwBK3n4OUxMpgzR14LnOOWoIIS K+ldBpCnFBxMuGK2oLLcpViL/49aTD29ZKm1Usy7MY7G4j7jZs4CRa5kejSmrgtTXm7I TNAF4VJ8tZT6xBi7pEx1ShvidZgfGbAwPBHhk= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=E41UMtMQq9iPtauKHLfE4KgGHiN671APeZaC9H2EG7w=; b=TU+am/IKY73bGUXb6VHUay3iPALW5632C2o1uzSqzCcif0SmNTmvJL7On3AFusjTut tL0k1epsOCZbMeepLjpd8yWs9f+1Rva27LiWNEkw0+bkW/p/3RQnxS9Gykh080L+bo5m naVaKdolf9PIoB4m5TEEyv4VvKblgTHZInvQNk8oy+YEsvJbjui/IPoLUTrButAKWAJR pO5VqPlfPAaMDzvumlmsl6LVQ4Gs3HVeTR2IxWWKel5Q2FOITvqpiSMLqzl6qTbBmP1l kwwYurgZaJA8NMAGoxYpIqzwcl2B8RV+4Ztbs2UPTUJohOscCcGgdJzLyP0hatZfUDg+ yb4A== X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfog+1EvRLlMWsvEOy8Auk7Q5LxD1ffqVP8HMznrs5/CYXK/UEcIp 6sAQGQT4eQ00i4PMeX6fzS7KF5+G4VO2cQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV60bkGixSTVGVmUlpo3mRzh4LACdLveLX45cZzS5OXESbZIqsUSdDVO3s4IjAiunuU9ikKt/zA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:6812:: with SMTP id k18-v6mr10085783ejr.47.1538396356874; Mon, 01 Oct 2018 05:19:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.189] (dhcp-5-186-116-96.cgn.ip.fibianet.dk. [5.186.116.96]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t44-v6sm5001655edd.96.2018.10.01.05.19.15 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 01 Oct 2018 05:19:16 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Kbuild: Some fixdep tweaks To: Masahiro Yamada Cc: Michal Marek , Linux Kbuild mailing list , Linux Kernel Mailing List References: <20180815142749.18804-1-linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> From: Rasmus Villemoes Message-ID: <0d8735ad-0672-3a76-d199-faf6717af730@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2018 14:19:14 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2018-09-28 04:21, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > Hi Rasmus, > > This patch set actually sits on the fence. > I tend to choose not-apply when I cannot make up my mind. > > If you have something more to convince me, please let me know. No, that's fine. I agree that the overall performance improvement for whole kernel builds is hard to measure, but that can be said for many small optimizations. Anyway, as I said, it's up to you, so let's just drop it. Thanks, Rasmus