From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8A3DC18DF5 for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 14:38:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C83692075B for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 14:37:51 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org C83692075B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729829AbeKUBHR (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Nov 2018 20:07:17 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:49976 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726040AbeKUBHQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Nov 2018 20:07:16 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E405EBD; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 06:37:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.1.196.62] (usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5EDF83F5A0; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 06:37:47 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Do not cond_resched_lock() with IRQs disabled To: Christoffer Dall , Julien Thierry Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, rostedt@goodmis.org, bigeasy@linutronix.de, stable@vger.kernel.org References: <1542647279-46609-1-git-send-email-julien.thierry@arm.com> <1542647279-46609-2-git-send-email-julien.thierry@arm.com> <20181120141832.GA11162@e113682-lin.lund.arm.com> From: Marc Zyngier Openpgp: preference=signencrypt Autocrypt: addr=marc.zyngier@arm.com; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= xsFNBE6Jf0UBEADLCxpix34Ch3kQKA9SNlVQroj9aHAEzzl0+V8jrvT9a9GkK+FjBOIQz4KE g+3p+lqgJH4NfwPm9H5I5e3wa+Scz9wAqWLTT772Rqb6hf6kx0kKd0P2jGv79qXSmwru28vJ t9NNsmIhEYwS5eTfCbsZZDCnR31J6qxozsDHpCGLHlYym/VbC199Uq/pN5gH+5JHZyhyZiNW ozUCjMqC4eNW42nYVKZQfbj/k4W9xFfudFaFEhAf/Vb1r6F05eBP1uopuzNkAN7vqS8XcgQH qXI357YC4ToCbmqLue4HK9+2mtf7MTdHZYGZ939OfTlOGuxFW+bhtPQzsHiW7eNe0ew0+LaL 3wdNzT5abPBscqXWVGsZWCAzBmrZato+Pd2bSCDPLInZV0j+rjt7MWiSxEAEowue3IcZA++7 ifTDIscQdpeKT8hcL+9eHLgoSDH62SlubO/y8bB1hV8JjLW/jQpLnae0oz25h39ij4ijcp8N t5slf5DNRi1NLz5+iaaLg4gaM3ywVK2VEKdBTg+JTg3dfrb3DH7ctTQquyKun9IVY8AsxMc6 lxl4HxrpLX7HgF10685GG5fFla7R1RUnW5svgQhz6YVU33yJjk5lIIrrxKI/wLlhn066mtu1 DoD9TEAjwOmpa6ofV6rHeBPehUwMZEsLqlKfLsl0PpsJwov8TQARAQABzSNNYXJjIFp5bmdp ZXIgPG1hcmMuenluZ2llckBhcm0uY29tPsLBewQTAQIAJQIbAwYLCQgHAwIGFQgCCQoLBBYC AwECHgECF4AFAk6NvYYCGQEACgkQI9DQutE9ekObww/+NcUATWXOcnoPflpYG43GZ0XjQLng LQFjBZL+CJV5+1XMDfz4ATH37cR+8gMO1UwmWPv5tOMKLHhw6uLxGG4upPAm0qxjRA/SE3LC 22kBjWiSMrkQgv5FDcwdhAcj8A+gKgcXBeyXsGBXLjo5UQOGvPTQXcqNXB9A3ZZN9vS6QUYN TXFjnUnzCJd+PVI/4jORz9EUVw1q/+kZgmA8/GhfPH3xNetTGLyJCJcQ86acom2liLZZX4+1 6Hda2x3hxpoQo7pTu+XA2YC4XyUstNDYIsE4F4NVHGi88a3N8yWE+Z7cBI2HjGvpfNxZnmKX 6bws6RQ4LHDPhy0yzWFowJXGTqM/e79c1UeqOVxKGFF3VhJJu1nMlh+5hnW4glXOoy/WmDEM UMbl9KbJUfo+GgIQGMp8mwgW0vK4HrSmevlDeMcrLdfbbFbcZLNeFFBn6KqxFZaTd+LpylIH bOPN6fy1Dxf7UZscogYw5Pt0JscgpciuO3DAZo3eXz6ffj2NrWchnbj+SpPBiH4srfFmHY+Y LBemIIOmSqIsjoSRjNEZeEObkshDVG5NncJzbAQY+V3Q3yo9og/8ZiaulVWDbcpKyUpzt7pv cdnY3baDE8ate/cymFP5jGJK++QCeA6u6JzBp7HnKbngqWa6g8qDSjPXBPCLmmRWbc5j0lvA 6ilrF8nOwU0ETol/RQEQAM/2pdLYCWmf3rtIiP8Wj5NwyjSL6/UrChXtoX9wlY8a4h3EX6E3 64snIJVMLbyr4bwdmPKULlny7T/R8dx/mCOWu/DztrVNQiXWOTKJnd/2iQblBT+W5W8ep/nS w3qUIckKwKdplQtzSKeE+PJ+GMS+DoNDDkcrVjUnsoCEr0aK3cO6g5hLGu8IBbC1CJYSpple VVb/sADnWF3SfUvJ/l4K8Uk4B4+X90KpA7U9MhvDTCy5mJGaTsFqDLpnqp/yqaT2P7kyMG2E w+eqtVIqwwweZA0S+tuqput5xdNAcsj2PugVx9tlw/LJo39nh8NrMxAhv5aQ+JJ2I8UTiHLX QvoC0Yc/jZX/JRB5r4x4IhK34Mv5TiH/gFfZbwxd287Y1jOaD9lhnke1SX5MXF7eCT3cgyB+ hgSu42w+2xYl3+rzIhQqxXhaP232t/b3ilJO00ZZ19d4KICGcakeiL6ZBtD8TrtkRiewI3v0 o8rUBWtjcDRgg3tWx/PcJvZnw1twbmRdaNvsvnlapD2Y9Js3woRLIjSAGOijwzFXSJyC2HU1 AAuR9uo4/QkeIrQVHIxP7TJZdJ9sGEWdeGPzzPlKLHwIX2HzfbdtPejPSXm5LJ026qdtJHgz BAb3NygZG6BH6EC1NPDQ6O53EXorXS1tsSAgp5ZDSFEBklpRVT3E0NrDABEBAAHCwV8EGAEC AAkFAk6Jf0UCGwwACgkQI9DQutE9ekMLBQ//U+Mt9DtFpzMCIHFPE9nNlsCm75j22lNiw6mX mx3cUA3pl+uRGQr/zQC5inQNtjFUmwGkHqrAw+SmG5gsgnM4pSdYvraWaCWOZCQCx1lpaCOl MotrNcwMJTJLQGc4BjJyOeSH59HQDitKfKMu/yjRhzT8CXhys6R0kYMrEN0tbe1cFOJkxSbV 0GgRTDF4PKyLT+RncoKxQe8lGxuk5614aRpBQa0LPafkirwqkUtxsPnarkPUEfkBlnIhAR8L kmneYLu0AvbWjfJCUH7qfpyS/FRrQCoBq9QIEcf2v1f0AIpA27f9KCEv5MZSHXGCdNcbjKw1 39YxYZhmXaHFKDSZIC29YhQJeXWlfDEDq6nIhvurZy3mSh2OMQgaIoFexPCsBBOclH8QUtMk a3jW/qYyrV+qUq9Wf3SKPrXf7B3xB332jFCETbyZQXqmowV+2b3rJFRWn5hK5B+xwvuxKyGq qDOGjof2dKl2zBIxbFgOclV7wqCVkhxSJi/QaOj2zBqSNPXga5DWtX3ekRnJLa1+ijXxmdjz hApihi08gwvP5G9fNGKQyRETePEtEAWt0b7dOqMzYBYGRVr7uS4uT6WP7fzOwAJC4lU7ZYWZ yVshCa0IvTtp1085RtT3qhh9mobkcZ+7cQOY+Tx2RGXS9WeOh2jZjdoWUv6CevXNQyOUXMM= Organization: ARM Ltd Message-ID: <0e12d8a7-2a76-e04a-ab18-ed9fc69d5d47@arm.com> Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 14:37:45 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux aarch64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20181120141832.GA11162@e113682-lin.lund.arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 20/11/2018 14:18, Christoffer Dall wrote: > On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 05:07:56PM +0000, Julien Thierry wrote: >> To change the active state of an MMIO, halt is requested for all vcpus of >> the affected guest before modifying the IRQ state. This is done by calling >> cond_resched_lock() in vgic_mmio_change_active(). However interrupts are >> disabled at this point and running a vcpu cannot get rescheduled. > > "running a vcpu cannot get rescheduled" ? > >> >> Solve this by waiting for all vcpus to be halted after emmiting the halt >> request. >> >> Fixes commit 6c1b7521f4a07cc63bbe2dfe290efed47cdb780a ("KVM: arm/arm64: >> Factor out functionality to get vgic mmio requester_vcpu") >> >> Signed-off-by: Julien Thierry >> Suggested-by: Marc Zyngier >> Cc: Christoffer Dall >> Cc: Marc Zyngier >> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org >> --- >> virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio.c | 33 +++++++++++---------------------- >> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio.c >> index f56ff1c..eefd877 100644 >> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio.c >> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio.c >> @@ -313,27 +313,6 @@ static void vgic_mmio_change_active(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vgic_irq *irq, >> >> spin_lock_irqsave(&irq->irq_lock, flags); >> >> - /* >> - * If this virtual IRQ was written into a list register, we >> - * have to make sure the CPU that runs the VCPU thread has >> - * synced back the LR state to the struct vgic_irq. >> - * >> - * As long as the conditions below are true, we know the VCPU thread >> - * may be on its way back from the guest (we kicked the VCPU thread in >> - * vgic_change_active_prepare) and still has to sync back this IRQ, >> - * so we release and re-acquire the spin_lock to let the other thread >> - * sync back the IRQ. >> - * >> - * When accessing VGIC state from user space, requester_vcpu is >> - * NULL, which is fine, because we guarantee that no VCPUs are running >> - * when accessing VGIC state from user space so irq->vcpu->cpu is >> - * always -1. >> - */ >> - while (irq->vcpu && /* IRQ may have state in an LR somewhere */ >> - irq->vcpu != requester_vcpu && /* Current thread is not the VCPU thread */ >> - irq->vcpu->cpu != -1) /* VCPU thread is running */ >> - cond_resched_lock(&irq->irq_lock); >> - >> if (irq->hw) { >> vgic_hw_irq_change_active(vcpu, irq, active, !requester_vcpu); >> } else { >> @@ -368,8 +347,18 @@ static void vgic_mmio_change_active(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vgic_irq *irq, >> */ >> static void vgic_change_active_prepare(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 intid) >> { >> - if (intid > VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS) >> + if (intid > VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS) { >> + struct kvm_vcpu *tmp; >> + int i; >> + >> kvm_arm_halt_guest(vcpu->kvm); >> + >> + /* Wait for each vcpu to be halted */ >> + kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, tmp, vcpu->kvm) { >> + while (tmp->cpu != -1) >> + cond_resched(); > > We used to have something like this which Andre then found out it could > deadlock the system, because the VCPU making this request wouldn't have > called kvm_arch_vcpu_put, and its cpu value would still have a value. > > That's why we have the vcpu && vcpu != requester check. Ah, I now remember that one. I guess it is a matter of skipping the requester vcpu in the kvm_for_each_vcpu loop. Thanks, M. -- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...