From: Tyrel Datwyler <tyreld@linux.ibm.com>
To: Brian King <brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com
Cc: martin.petersen@oracle.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
brking@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 15/17] ibmvfc: send Cancel MAD down each hw scsi channel
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2020 14:09:42 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0e1760c8-ced0-cd50-391f-29a5a9ea340a@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <21a7c970-2184-0524-5b42-1920eaa422a2@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On 12/2/20 10:27 AM, Brian King wrote:
> On 12/1/20 6:53 PM, Tyrel Datwyler wrote:
>> In general the client needs to send Cancel MADs and task management
>> commands down the same channel as the command(s) intended to cancel or
>> abort. The client assigns cancel keys per LUN and thus must send a
>> Cancel down each channel commands were submitted for that LUN. Further,
>> the client then must wait for those cancel completions prior to
>> submitting a LUN RESET or ABORT TASK SET.
>>
>> Allocate event pointers for each possible scsi channel and assign an
>> event for each channel that requires a cancel. Wait for completion each
>> submitted cancel.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tyrel Datwyler <tyreld@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c | 106 +++++++++++++++++++++------------
>> 1 file changed, 68 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c b/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c
>> index 0b6284020f06..97e8eed04b01 100644
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c
>> @@ -2339,32 +2339,52 @@ static int ibmvfc_cancel_all(struct scsi_device *sdev, int type)
>> {
>> struct ibmvfc_host *vhost = shost_priv(sdev->host);
>> struct ibmvfc_event *evt, *found_evt;
>> - union ibmvfc_iu rsp;
>> - int rsp_rc = -EBUSY;
>> + struct ibmvfc_event **evt_list;
>> + union ibmvfc_iu *rsp;
>> + int rsp_rc = 0;
>> unsigned long flags;
>> u16 status;
>> + int num_hwq = 1;
>> + int i;
>> + int ret = 0;
>>
>> ENTER;
>> spin_lock_irqsave(vhost->host->host_lock, flags);
>> - found_evt = NULL;
>> - list_for_each_entry(evt, &vhost->sent, queue) {
>> - if (evt->cmnd && evt->cmnd->device == sdev) {
>> - found_evt = evt;
>> - break;
>> + if (vhost->using_channels && vhost->scsi_scrqs.active_queues)
>> + num_hwq = vhost->scsi_scrqs.active_queues;
>> +
>> + evt_list = kcalloc(num_hwq, sizeof(*evt_list), GFP_KERNE> + rsp = kcalloc(num_hwq, sizeof(*rsp), GFP_KERNEL);
>
> Can't this just go on the stack? We don't want to be allocating memory
> during error recovery. Or, alternatively, you could put this in the
> vhost structure and protect it with a mutex. We only have enough events
> to single thread these anyway.
Yes, this could just go on the stack.
>
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < num_hwq; i++) {
>> + sdev_printk(KERN_INFO, sdev, "Cancelling outstanding commands on queue %d.\n", i);
>
> Prior to this patch, if there was nothing outstanding to the device and cancel_all was called,
> no messages would get printed. This is changing that behavior. Is that intentional? Additionally,
> it looks like this will get a lot more vebose, logging a message for each hw queue, regardless
> of whether there was anything outstanding. Perhaps you want to move this down to after the check
> for !found_evt?
It would actually print "no commands found to cancel". I think its fair to make
it less verbose or at least make them dbg output for each queue.
-Tyrel
>
>> +
>> + found_evt = NULL;
>> + list_for_each_entry(evt, &vhost->sent, queue) {
>> + if (evt->cmnd && evt->cmnd->device == sdev && evt->hwq == i) {
>> + found_evt = evt;
>> + break;
>> + }
>> }
>> - }
>>
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-02 22:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-02 0:53 [PATCH v2 00/17] ibmvfc: initial MQ development Tyrel Datwyler
2020-12-02 0:53 ` [PATCH v2 01/17] ibmvfc: add vhost fields and defaults for MQ enablement Tyrel Datwyler
2020-12-02 15:14 ` Brian King
2020-12-02 17:27 ` Tyrel Datwyler
2020-12-04 14:26 ` Brian King
2020-12-07 11:56 ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-12-08 22:37 ` Tyrel Datwyler
2020-12-17 11:49 ` John Garry
2020-12-02 0:53 ` [PATCH v2 02/17] ibmvfc: define hcall wrapper for registering a Sub-CRQ Tyrel Datwyler
2020-12-02 0:53 ` [PATCH v2 03/17] ibmvfc: add Subordinate CRQ definitions Tyrel Datwyler
2020-12-02 0:53 ` [PATCH v2 04/17] ibmvfc: add alloc/dealloc routines for SCSI Sub-CRQ Channels Tyrel Datwyler
2020-12-02 15:25 ` Brian King
2020-12-02 22:23 ` Tyrel Datwyler
2020-12-02 0:53 ` [PATCH v2 05/17] ibmvfc: add Sub-CRQ IRQ enable/disable routine Tyrel Datwyler
2020-12-02 0:53 ` [PATCH v2 06/17] ibmvfc: add handlers to drain and complete Sub-CRQ responses Tyrel Datwyler
2020-12-02 15:46 ` Brian King
2020-12-02 22:28 ` Tyrel Datwyler
2020-12-02 15:56 ` Brian King
2020-12-02 0:53 ` [PATCH v2 07/17] ibmvfc: define Sub-CRQ interrupt handler routine Tyrel Datwyler
2020-12-02 0:53 ` [PATCH v2 08/17] ibmvfc: map/request irq and register Sub-CRQ interrupt handler Tyrel Datwyler
2020-12-02 0:53 ` [PATCH v2 09/17] ibmvfc: implement channel enquiry and setup commands Tyrel Datwyler
2020-12-02 15:51 ` Brian King
2020-12-02 0:53 ` [PATCH v2 10/17] ibmvfc: advertise client support for using hardware channels Tyrel Datwyler
2020-12-02 0:53 ` [PATCH v2 11/17] ibmvfc: set and track hw queue in ibmvfc_event struct Tyrel Datwyler
2020-12-02 0:53 ` [PATCH v2 12/17] ibmvfc: send commands down HW Sub-CRQ when channelized Tyrel Datwyler
2020-12-02 0:53 ` [PATCH v2 13/17] ibmvfc: register Sub-CRQ handles with VIOS during channel setup Tyrel Datwyler
2020-12-02 0:53 ` [PATCH v2 14/17] ibmvfc: add cancel mad initialization helper Tyrel Datwyler
2020-12-02 16:00 ` Brian King
2020-12-02 0:53 ` [PATCH v2 15/17] ibmvfc: send Cancel MAD down each hw scsi channel Tyrel Datwyler
2020-12-02 18:27 ` Brian King
2020-12-02 22:09 ` Tyrel Datwyler [this message]
2020-12-02 0:53 ` [PATCH v2 16/17] ibmvfc: enable MQ and set reasonable defaults Tyrel Datwyler
2020-12-02 18:31 ` Brian King
2020-12-02 0:53 ` [PATCH v2 17/17] ibmvfc: provide modules parameters for MQ settings Tyrel Datwyler
2020-12-02 18:40 ` Brian King
2020-12-02 22:17 ` Tyrel Datwyler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0e1760c8-ced0-cd50-391f-29a5a9ea340a@linux.ibm.com \
--to=tyreld@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=brking@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).