linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Paasch <christoph.paasch@gmail.com>,
	Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Samudrala, Sridhar" <sridhar.samudrala@intel.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v3 4/8] net: Change return type of sk_busy_loop from bool to void
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 11:33:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0eb092b7ca67942f52e36c672d20f130f1d54e1e.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALMXkpZ_eB+aRx3+aKM5Bs4RwDfzPNX+XneESo2-yuMPjHV5-Q@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

On Thu, 2019-03-21 at 23:05 -0400, Christoph Paasch wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 12:43 PM Alexander Duyck
> <alexander.duyck@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 2:45 AM Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > The following - completely untested - should avoid the unbounded loop,
> > > but it's not a complete fix, I *think* we should also change
> > > sk_busy_loop_end() in a similar way, but that is a little more complex
> > > due to the additional indirections.
> > 
> > As far as sk_busy_loop_end we could look at just forking sk_busy_loop
> > and writing a separate implementation for datagram sockets that uses a
> > different loop_end function. It shouldn't take much to change since
> > all we would need to do is pass a structure containing the sk and last
> > pointers instead of just passing the sk directly as the loop_end
> > argument.
> > 
> > > Could you please test it?
> > > 
> > > Any feedback welcome!
> > 
> > The change below looks good to me.
> 
> I just tried it out. Worked for me!
> 
> You can add my Tested-by if you do a formal patch-submission:
> 
> Tested-by: Christoph Paasch <cpaasch@apple.com>

Thanks for testing!

I'm trying to reproduce the issue locally, but I'm unable. I think that
the current UDP implementation is not affected, as we always ensure
sk_receive_queue is empty before busy polling. Unix sockets should not
be affected, too, as busy polling should not have any effect there
(sk_napi_id should be never >= MIN_NAPI_ID). Can you reproduce the
issue on an unpatched, recent, upstream kernel?

Can you please provide the syzkaller repro?

Thanks,

Paolo






  reply	other threads:[~2019-03-22 10:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-24 17:07 [net-next PATCH v3 0/8] Add busy poll support for epoll Alexander Duyck
2017-03-24 17:07 ` [net-next PATCH v3 1/8] net: Busy polling should ignore sender CPUs Alexander Duyck
2017-03-24 17:08 ` [net-next PATCH v3 2/8] tcp: Record Rx hash and NAPI ID in tcp_child_process Alexander Duyck
2017-03-24 17:08 ` [net-next PATCH v3 3/8] net: Only define skb_mark_napi_id in one spot instead of two Alexander Duyck
2017-03-24 17:08 ` [net-next PATCH v3 4/8] net: Change return type of sk_busy_loop from bool to void Alexander Duyck
2019-03-20 18:35   ` Christoph Paasch
2019-03-20 19:40     ` David Miller
2019-03-21  9:45     ` Paolo Abeni
2019-03-21 14:28       ` Willem de Bruijn
2019-03-21 16:43       ` Alexander Duyck
2019-03-22  3:05         ` Christoph Paasch
2019-03-22 10:33           ` Paolo Abeni [this message]
2019-03-22 12:59             ` Eric Dumazet
2019-03-22 13:35               ` Paolo Abeni
2019-03-22 19:25             ` Christoph Paasch
2017-03-24 17:08 ` [net-next PATCH v3 5/8] net: Track start of busy loop instead of when it should end Alexander Duyck
2017-03-25  3:34   ` Eric Dumazet
2017-03-24 17:08 ` [net-next PATCH v3 6/8] net: Commonize busy polling code to focus on napi_id instead of socket Alexander Duyck
2017-03-24 17:08 ` [net-next PATCH v3 7/8] epoll: Add busy poll support to epoll with socket fds Alexander Duyck
2017-03-25  3:33   ` Eric Dumazet
2017-03-24 17:08 ` [net-next PATCH v3 8/8] net: Introduce SO_INCOMING_NAPI_ID Alexander Duyck
2017-03-25  2:23 ` [net-next PATCH v3 0/8] Add busy poll support for epoll David Miller
2017-03-25  3:49 ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0eb092b7ca67942f52e36c672d20f130f1d54e1e.camel@redhat.com \
    --to=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=alexander.duyck@gmail.com \
    --cc=christoph.paasch@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sridhar.samudrala@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).