Re: [PATCH v2 11/11] perf test: add expr test for pmu metrics

[John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>]

On 23/04/2020 15:22, Ian Rogers wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 4:29 AM Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 03:04:30PM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote:
>>
>> SNIP
>>
>>> +
>>> +static int pmu_tests(void)
>>> +{
>>> +     struct pmu_events_map *map;
>>> +     struct pmu_event *pe;
>>> +     int i, j, k;
>>> +     const char **ids;
>>> +     int idnum;
>>> +     int ret = 0;
>>> +     struct expr_parse_ctx ctx;
>>> +     double result;
>>> +
>>> +     i = 0;
>>> +     for (;;) {
>>> +             map = &pmu_events_map[i++];
>>> +             if (!map->table) {
>>> +                     map = NULL;
>>> +                     break;
>>> +             }
>>> +             j = 0;
>>> +             for (;;) {
>>> +                     pe = &map->table[j++];
>>> +                     if (!pe->name && !pe->metric_group && !pe->metric_name)
>>> +                             break;
>>> +                     if (!pe->metric_expr)
>>> +                             continue;
>>
>> so we go throught all the metrics for the current cpu
>> and test the parsing on them.. great!
> 
> It's not just the current CPU (such as skylake) it is every map
> (skylake, cascade lake, etc), but this only works for the architecture
> that jevents built.
> If jevents built all architectures then this could check them as well.
> Perhaps there should be a jevents test suite, but I think even then
> this test has value.

note: there is test__pmu_events(), which verifies that some test events 
generated in pmu-events.c are as expected, and also verifies that we 
create PMU events aliases as expected (for those test events). Nothing 
is done for metrics, ATM.

Thanks,
John