From: Sameer Pujar <spujar@nvidia.com>
To: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>,
Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>, <perex@perex.cz>,
<tiwai@suse.com>, <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: <spujar@nvidia.com>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
<alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>, <atalambedu@nvidia.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
<viswanathl@nvidia.com>, <sharadg@nvidia.com>,
<broonie@kernel.org>, <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
<linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>, <rlokhande@nvidia.com>,
<mkumard@nvidia.com>, <dramesh@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 4/9] ASoC: tegra: add Tegra210 based I2S driver
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2020 14:52:14 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0fc814c2-0dc6-7741-b954-463381ff7fb9@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1a84b393-938f-8bed-d08e-cc3bb6ed4844@gmail.com>
On 1/22/2020 9:57 PM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>
>
> 22.01.2020 14:52, Jon Hunter пишет:
>> On 22/01/2020 07:16, Sameer Pujar wrote:
>>
>> ...
>>
>>>>>>>>> +static int tegra210_i2s_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>>>>>>> +{
>>>>>>>>> + pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
>>>>>>>>> + if (!pm_runtime_status_suspended(&pdev->dev))
>>>>>>>>> + tegra210_i2s_runtime_suspend(&pdev->dev);
>>>>>>>> This breaks device's RPM refcounting if it was disabled in the active
>>>>>>>> state. This code should be removed. At most you could warn about the
>>>>>>>> unxpected RPM state here, but it shouldn't be necessary.
>>>>>>> I guess this was added for safety and explicit suspend keeps clock
>>>>>>> disabled.
>>>>>>> Not sure if ref-counting of the device matters when runtime PM is
>>>>>>> disabled and device is removed.
>>>>>>> I see few drivers using this way.
>>>>>> It should matter (if I'm not missing something) because RPM should
>>>>>> be in
>>>>>> a wrecked state once you'll try to re-load the driver's module. Likely
>>>>>> that those few other drivers are wrong.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [snip]
>>>>> Once the driver is re-loaded and RPM is enabled, I don't think it
>>>>> would use
>>>>> the same 'dev' and the corresponding ref count. Doesn't it use the new
>>>>> counters?
>>>>> If RPM is not working for some reason, most likely it would be the case
>>>>> for other
>>>>> devices. What best driver can do is probably do a force suspend during
>>>>> removal if
>>>>> already not done. I would prefer to keep, since multiple drivers still
>>>>> have it,
>>>>> unless there is a real harm in doing so.
>>>> I took a closer look and looks like the counter actually should be
>>>> reset. Still I don't think that it's a good practice to make changes
>>>> underneath of RPM, it may strike back.
>>> If RPM is broken, it probably would have been caught during device usage.
>>> I will remove explicit suspend here if no any concerns from other folks.
>>> Thanks.
>> I recall that this was the preferred way of doing this from the RPM
>> folks. Tegra30 I2S driver does the same and Stephen had pointed me to
>> this as a reference.
>> I believe that this is meant to ensure that the
>> device is always powered-off regardless of it RPM is enabled or not and
>> what the current state is.
> Yes, it was kinda actual for the case of unavailable RPM.
> Anyways, /I think/ variant like this should have been more preferred:
>
> if (!pm_runtime_enabled(&pdev->dev))
> tegra210_i2s_runtime_suspend(&pdev->dev);
> else
> pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
I think it looks to be similar to what is there already.
pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev); // it would turn out to be a dummy call
if !RPM
if (!pm_runtime_status_suspended(&pdev->dev)) // it is true always if !RPM
tegra210_i2s_runtime_suspend(&pdev->dev);
>> Now for Tegra210 (or actually 64-bit Tegra) RPM is always enabled and so
>> we don't need to worry about the !RPM case. However, I still don't see
>> the harm in this.
> There is no real harm today, but:
>
> 1. I'd prefer to be very careful with RPM in general, based on
> previous experience.
>
> 2. It should be a bug if device isn't RPM-suspended during
> of driver's removal. Thus the real problem needs to be fixed
> rather than worked around.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-23 9:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-20 14:23 [PATCH 0/9] add ASoC components for AHUB Sameer Pujar
2020-01-20 14:23 ` [PATCH 1/9] dt-bindings: sound: tegra: add DT binding " Sameer Pujar
2020-01-20 14:23 ` [PATCH 2/9] ASoC: tegra: add support for CIF programming Sameer Pujar
2020-01-20 15:58 ` [alsa-devel] " Dmitry Osipenko
2020-01-21 4:41 ` Sameer Pujar
2020-01-21 16:04 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2020-01-27 5:11 ` Sameer Pujar
2020-01-28 22:40 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2020-01-20 14:23 ` [PATCH 3/9] ASoC: tegra: add Tegra210 based DMIC driver Sameer Pujar
2020-01-20 14:23 ` [PATCH 4/9] ASoC: tegra: add Tegra210 based I2S driver Sameer Pujar
2020-01-21 5:15 ` [alsa-devel] " Dmitry Osipenko
2020-01-21 14:21 ` Sameer Pujar
2020-01-21 16:03 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2020-01-22 4:32 ` Sameer Pujar
2020-01-22 6:23 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2020-01-22 7:16 ` Sameer Pujar
2020-01-22 11:52 ` Jon Hunter
2020-01-22 16:27 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2020-01-23 9:22 ` Sameer Pujar [this message]
2020-01-23 15:16 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2020-01-24 9:07 ` Jon Hunter
2020-01-24 9:51 ` Jon Hunter
2020-01-24 14:04 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2020-01-27 5:22 ` Sameer Pujar
2020-01-29 3:41 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2020-02-14 14:05 ` Jon Hunter
2020-02-18 1:00 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2020-02-19 16:10 ` Sameer Pujar
2020-01-22 16:26 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2020-01-20 14:23 ` [PATCH 5/9] ASoC: tegra: add Tegra210 based AHUB driver Sameer Pujar
2020-01-24 1:18 ` [alsa-devel] " Dmitry Osipenko
2020-01-24 3:39 ` Sameer Pujar
2020-01-24 4:28 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2020-01-27 9:45 ` Jon Hunter
2020-01-20 14:23 ` [PATCH 6/9] ASoC: tegra: add Tegra186 based DSPK driver Sameer Pujar
2020-01-20 14:23 ` [PATCH 7/9] ASoC: tegra: add Tegra210 based ADMAIF driver Sameer Pujar
2020-01-24 1:28 ` [alsa-devel] " Dmitry Osipenko
2020-01-24 3:27 ` Sameer Pujar
2020-01-24 4:25 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2020-01-27 5:08 ` Sameer Pujar
2020-01-20 14:23 ` [PATCH 8/9] arm64: tegra: add AHUB components for few Tegra chips Sameer Pujar
2020-01-20 14:23 ` [PATCH 9/9] arm64: tegra: enable AHUB modules " Sameer Pujar
2020-01-28 10:49 ` [PATCH 0/9] add ASoC components for AHUB Sameer Pujar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0fc814c2-0dc6-7741-b954-463381ff7fb9@nvidia.com \
--to=spujar@nvidia.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=atalambedu@nvidia.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=digetx@gmail.com \
--cc=dramesh@nvidia.com \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mkumard@nvidia.com \
--cc=perex@perex.cz \
--cc=rlokhande@nvidia.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=sharadg@nvidia.com \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=tiwai@suse.com \
--cc=viswanathl@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).