From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64E40C433E2 for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 16:59:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 237A62087C for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 16:59:03 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1599670743; bh=+icd9iFPfE9J69QdGJrm2iSgwufEUYZ3m5WGuFBDVpQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=Vq91uwMEbpCWVA9Do34g3MnwT49TWuLkGpoXHlTqxa5Le7Ms0sDV6nW6u+W2qecNB mRO+5uXpuEsfoBk12DZrha8pVSYqLdss/oT1HSwdRf63DN7Ys7tL50OvJllY6eywGF VAGskSSqAEGuZR9otWUWYiZw+niC7cx97jPIbkBU= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730890AbgIIQ65 (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Sep 2020 12:58:57 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:51828 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730662AbgIIPvR (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Sep 2020 11:51:17 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org (ip5f5ad5d6.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de [95.90.213.214]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 37329221E3; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 14:11:05 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1599660665; bh=+icd9iFPfE9J69QdGJrm2iSgwufEUYZ3m5WGuFBDVpQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=y9lRJtI2VAWUaEoZNeb0gjvYSEoK/9a8wTTAPSvXNgjlgXDlGxqysP21D4ECNps4Y cqo0v3e2bpOuYBAugSig6EeWVF1ZN/KebDjzK0jyaiijDQ35yb5gjwTwB2NQWtlO7v Udy5VGXkbX9PHYy8bYrpxn7TiC28LvH4e1DTxGts= Received: from mchehab by mail.kernel.org with local (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1kG0oR-00DUX0-Bb; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 16:11:03 +0200 From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab To: Linux Doc Mailing List , Jonathan Corbet Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 11/30] tools: docs: memory-model: fix references for some files Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2020 16:10:42 +0200 Message-Id: <0ff57854da54860ec0bc49368bf2bb215fff93b6.1599660067.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.26.2 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org - The sysfs.txt file was converted to ReST and renamed; - The control-dependencies.txt is not at Documentation/control-dependencies.txt. As it is at the same dir as the README file, which mentions it, just remove Documentation/. With that, ./scripts/documentation-file-ref-check script is now happy again for files under tools/. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab --- tools/memory-model/Documentation/README | 2 +- tools/memory-model/Documentation/ordering.txt | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/memory-model/Documentation/README b/tools/memory-model/Documentation/README index 16177aaa9752..004969992bac 100644 --- a/tools/memory-model/Documentation/README +++ b/tools/memory-model/Documentation/README @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ README Documentation/cheatsheet.txt Quick-reference guide to the Linux-kernel memory model. -Documentation/control-dependencies.txt +control-dependencies.txt A guide to preventing compiler optimizations from destroying your control dependencies. diff --git a/tools/memory-model/Documentation/ordering.txt b/tools/memory-model/Documentation/ordering.txt index 3d020bed8585..629b19ae64a6 100644 --- a/tools/memory-model/Documentation/ordering.txt +++ b/tools/memory-model/Documentation/ordering.txt @@ -346,7 +346,7 @@ o Accessing RCU-protected pointers via rcu_dereference() If there is any significant processing of the pointer value between the rcu_dereference() that returned it and a later - dereference(), please read Documentation/RCU/rcu_dereference.txt. + dereference(), please read Documentation/RCU/rcu_dereference.rst. It can also be quite helpful to review uses in the Linux kernel. -- 2.26.2