From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 8 Oct 2001 13:56:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 8 Oct 2001 13:55:50 -0400 Received: from ssh-yyz.somanetworks.com ([216.126.67.45]:14690 "EHLO dryline-fw.wireless-sys.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 8 Oct 2001 13:55:47 -0400 Subject: Re: [RFC] Standard way of generating assembler offsets From: Georg Nikodym To: george anzinger Cc: Pantelis Antoniou , Linux Kernel List In-Reply-To: <3BC1E294.1A4FB12D@mvista.com> In-Reply-To: <28136.1002196028@ocs3.intra.ocs.com.au> <3BC1735F.41CBF5C1@intracom.gr> <3BC1E294.1A4FB12D@mvista.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/0.15.99+cvs.2001.10.05.08.08 (Preview Release) Date: 08 Oct 2001 13:56:11 -0400 Message-Id: <1002563771.21079.3.camel@keller> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org At the risk of sticking my foot in it, is there something wrong with the ANSI C offsetof() macro, defined in ? --Georg