From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 2 Nov 2001 13:24:36 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 2 Nov 2001 13:24:27 -0500 Received: from [208.232.58.25] ([208.232.58.25]:22219 "EHLO kronos.usol.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 2 Nov 2001 13:24:19 -0500 Subject: APM/ACPI From: Sean Middleditch To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/0.16.99+cvs.2001.10.30.16.08 (Preview Release) Date: 02 Nov 2001 13:23:44 -0500 Message-Id: <1004725424.4883.33.camel@smiddle> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Greetings, On my nice new shiny cheap Compaq Laptop, I am unable to get APM working. It is a Via VT82C686 motherboard. The APM support seems to be running (RH 7.2, rawhide 2.4.12 kernels, at the moment), but I'm always told that I'm on AC, and there is no system battery. I do have a battery, and I'm often not on AC power. /proc/apm spits out the following: 1.14ac 1.2 0x03 0x01 0x44 0x80 -1% -1 ? This is with the AC plug pulled out. I have no clue what the real battery status would be. I read there is now also ACPI, and in /proc/pci I see something about: VT82C686 [Apollo Super ACPI] But I don't know how to configure it. APM seems to be compiled into the RH kernels (there is no apm module loaded, like I would on Debian), and I don't see anything regarding ACPI. I also read that ACPI should automatically take over APM if support is available. How can I tell if I'm not using ACPI because it's not supported, or because it's not compiled in? Thanks everyone! Sean Etc.