From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 2 Nov 2001 13:59:09 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 2 Nov 2001 13:58:04 -0500 Received: from [208.232.58.25] ([208.232.58.25]:60887 "EHLO kronos.usol.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 2 Nov 2001 13:57:19 -0500 Subject: Re: APM/ACPI From: Sean Middleditch To: Patrick Mochel Cc: Alan Cox , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/0.16.99+cvs.2001.10.30.16.08 (Preview Release) Date: 02 Nov 2001 13:56:46 -0500 Message-Id: <1004727406.4883.51.camel@smiddle> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Alrighty! Thank you! I'll play around and see if I can't get it to work. I don't really care about suspend and whatnot at the moment, I just want a warning when my battery is getting low. ~,^ Sean Etc. On Fri, 2001-11-02 at 13:42, Patrick Mochel wrote: > > On 2 Nov 2001, Sean Middleditch wrote: > > > Hmm, not to point fingers or anything, but... > > > > "The WindowsXP that came preinstalled supported it!" > > Windows XP requires systems to be fully ACPI (1.0b?) compliant. So, you > probably have an ACPII BIOS, though many BIOSes have some remnants of APM > left in them... > > > I dunno, perhaps there is some proprietary protocol? Is ACPI backwards > > compat with APM? I mean, if the laptop doesn't support APM, would that > > mean it can't support ACPI? > > Probably not, no, and no. ACPI support in Linux is still maturing, and > many things still do not work. I would recommend the ACPI mailing list and > archives for more assistance: > > http://phobos.fs.tum.de/acpi/index.html > > > -pat > >