From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>,
Lina Iyer <ilina@codeaurora.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 00/11] PM / Domains: Support hierarchical CPU arrangement (PSCI/ARM) (a subset)
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2018 11:01:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <10136406.EY9A7BdqYq@aspire.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPDyKFq0GLs2AMA+6b-Khf+4kGxzVCTvtehp-YmwV2h=_SP4=g@mail.gmail.com>
On Thursday, October 4, 2018 10:58:53 AM CEST Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 4 October 2018 at 10:39, Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 4:39 PM Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> I have digested the review comments so far, including a recent offlist chat
> >> with with Lorenzo Pieralisi around the debatable PSCI changes. More or less I
> >> have a plan for how to move forward.
> >>
> >> However, to avoid re-posting non-changed patches over and over again, I decided
> >> to withhold the more debatable part from this v9, hence this is not the complete
> >> series to make things play. In v9, I have just included the trivial changes,
> >> which are either already acked/reviewed or hopefully can be rather soon/easily.
> >>
> >> My hope is to get this queued for v4.20, to move things forward. I know it's
> >> late, but there are more or less nothing new here since v8.
> >
> > I have no problems with the first three patches in this series, so I
> > can apply them right away. Do you want me to do that?
>
> Yes, please.
>
> >
> > As for the rest, the cpuidle driver patch looks OK to me, but the
> > PSCI-related ones need ACKs.
>
> For some yes, but I think you can go ahead with a few more.
>
> Patch 4, 5 is already acked/reviewed.
>
> Patch 6 should be fine (if you are okay with it else wait for an ack
> from Daniel)
OK, thanks.
Do the 4-6 depend on the 1-3?
> Patch 7 and 8 should be fine. They were suggested by Mark.
I'd rather have ACKs on these two as well.
> Patch 9 and 10 needs acks.
>
> Patch 11 has been acked, but depends on the other PSCI changes.
OK
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-04 9:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-03 14:38 [PATCH v9 00/11] PM / Domains: Support hierarchical CPU arrangement (PSCI/ARM) (a subset) Ulf Hansson
2018-10-03 14:38 ` [PATCH v9 01/11] PM / Domains: Don't treat zero found compatible idle states as an error Ulf Hansson
2018-10-03 14:38 ` [PATCH v9 02/11] PM / Domains: Deal with multiple states but no governor in genpd Ulf Hansson
2018-10-03 14:38 ` [PATCH v9 03/11] PM / Domains: Document flags for genpd Ulf Hansson
2018-10-04 13:48 ` Tony Lindgren
2018-10-04 14:57 ` Ulf Hansson
2018-10-04 16:13 ` Tony Lindgren
2018-10-03 14:38 ` [PATCH v9 04/11] dt: psci: Update DT bindings to support hierarchical PSCI states Ulf Hansson
2018-10-10 15:03 ` Sudeep Holla
2018-10-11 14:44 ` Ulf Hansson
2018-10-11 16:41 ` Sudeep Holla
2018-10-12 9:43 ` Ulf Hansson
2018-10-12 10:13 ` Sudeep Holla
2018-10-12 10:24 ` Ulf Hansson
2018-10-03 14:38 ` [PATCH v9 05/11] of: base: Add of_get_cpu_state_node() to get idle states for a CPU node Ulf Hansson
2018-10-10 15:03 ` Sudeep Holla
2018-10-11 15:05 ` Ulf Hansson
2018-10-11 16:01 ` Sudeep Holla
2018-10-03 14:38 ` [PATCH v9 06/11] cpuidle: dt: Support hierarchical CPU idle states Ulf Hansson
2018-10-10 15:03 ` Sudeep Holla
2018-10-03 14:38 ` [PATCH v9 07/11] drivers: firmware: psci: Move psci to separate directory Ulf Hansson
2018-10-03 14:38 ` [PATCH v9 08/11] MAINTAINERS: Update files for PSCI Ulf Hansson
2018-10-03 14:38 ` [PATCH v9 09/11] drivers: firmware: psci: Split psci_dt_cpu_init_idle() Ulf Hansson
2018-10-03 14:38 ` [PATCH v9 10/11] drivers: firmware: psci: Support hierarchical CPU idle states Ulf Hansson
2018-10-03 14:38 ` [PATCH v9 11/11] drivers: firmware: psci: Simplify error path of psci_dt_init() Ulf Hansson
2018-10-04 8:39 ` [PATCH v9 00/11] PM / Domains: Support hierarchical CPU arrangement (PSCI/ARM) (a subset) Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-10-04 8:58 ` Ulf Hansson
2018-10-04 9:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2018-10-04 9:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-10-04 10:10 ` Ulf Hansson
2018-10-04 15:57 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2018-10-04 17:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-10-04 17:21 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2018-10-04 18:36 ` Ulf Hansson
2018-10-04 18:38 ` Ulf Hansson
2018-10-05 10:47 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2018-10-05 11:49 ` Ulf Hansson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=10136406.EY9A7BdqYq@aspire.rjw.lan \
--to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=ilina@codeaurora.org \
--cc=khilman@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).