From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 28 May 2002 06:56:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 28 May 2002 06:56:37 -0400 Received: from pc2-cwma1-5-cust12.swa.cable.ntl.com ([80.5.121.12]:59128 "EHLO irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 28 May 2002 06:56:36 -0400 Subject: Re: 2.4 SRMMU bug revisited From: Alan Cox To: "David S. Miller" Cc: szepe@pinerecords.com, colin@gibbs.dhs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tcallawa@redhat.com, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, aurora-sparc-devel@linuxpower.org In-Reply-To: <20020527.204114.126236775.davem@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.3 (1.0.3-6) Date: 28 May 2002 12:58:38 +0100 Message-Id: <1022587118.4124.49.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2002-05-28 at 04:41, David S. Miller wrote: > From: Tomas Szepe > Date: Mon, 27 May 2002 23:30:16 +0200 > > http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.4/ > > The BK repository to use has the URL: > > bk://linux.bkbits.net/linux-2.4 > > The web stuff is updated still by hand and is as a result chronically > out of date. Which is a concern since both Linus and Larry made it clear bitkeeper would *NEVER* be required of contributors. Is there nothing generating nightly tarballs off cron right now ?