From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+akpm=40zip.com.au@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S316606AbSFFBLu>; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 21:11:50 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S316615AbSFFBLt>; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 21:11:49 -0400
Received: from gateway-1237.mvista.com ([12.44.186.158]:48113 "EHLO
	hermes.mvista.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S316606AbSFFBLt>; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 21:11:49 -0400
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scheduler hints
From: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
To: Gerrit Huizenga <gh@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Rick Bressler <rickb@mushroom.ca.boeing.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <E17FliU-0006IZ-00@w-gerrit2>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.3 (1.0.3-6) 
Date: 05 Jun 2002 18:11:38 -0700
Message-Id: <1023325903.912.390.camel@sinai>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, 2002-06-05 at 18:05, Gerrit Huizenga wrote:

> Actually, process-to-process affinity, which was later generalized
> as a process gang affinity.

Oh OK, gang affinity - a bit different and not what we do now :)

Interesting to look into, although not terribly useful I suspect weighed
against its implementation...

	Robert Love