From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 30 Aug 2002 07:13:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 30 Aug 2002 07:13:42 -0400 Received: from pc1-cwma1-5-cust128.swa.cable.ntl.com ([80.5.120.128]:40174 "EHLO irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 30 Aug 2002 07:13:41 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1 / ...] i386 dynamic fixup/self modifying code From: Alan Cox To: Luca Barbieri Cc: Pavel Machek , Linux-Kernel ML , Linus Torvalds In-Reply-To: <1030666256.1491.143.camel@ldb> References: <1030506106.1489.27.camel@ldb> <20020828121129.A35@toy.ucw.cz> <1030663192.1326.20.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> <1030663772.1491.107.camel@ldb> <1030663955.1327.27.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> <1030666256.1491.143.camel@ldb> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-6) Date: 30 Aug 2002 12:17:59 +0100 Message-Id: <1030706279.3180.26.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2002-08-30 at 01:10, Luca Barbieri wrote: > That wouldn't work for compiler-generated prefetches (unless you > preprocess the compiler output) and would enlarge the kernel. > However, it would be significantly cleaner. My general experience with compiler generated prefetches right now is pretty poor for kernel type code. Its hard to do it right in the compiler for complex stuff rather than 'fortran in C' type jobs We certainly could perl the asm to drop in the right directives if it became an issue, but there are children on the list so lets worry about it if it becomes a problem