From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S318040AbSIJTYg>; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 15:24:36 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S318044AbSIJTYf>; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 15:24:35 -0400
Received: from svr-ganmtc-appserv-mgmt.ncf.coxexpress.com ([24.136.46.5]:35076
	"EHLO svr-ganmtc-appserv-mgmt.ncf.coxexpress.com") by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id <S318040AbSIJTYf>; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 15:24:35 -0400
Subject: Re: XFS?
From: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
To: Shawn <core@enodev.com>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
       Thunder from the hill <thunder@lightweight.ods.org>,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <20020910142347.A5000@q.mn.rr.com>
References: <p73wupuq34l.fsf@oldwotan.suse.de>
	<20020909193820.GA2007@lnuxlab.ath.cx.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
	<Pine.LNX.4.44.0209091457590.3793-100000@hawkeye.luckynet.adm.suse.lists.lin
	 ux.kernel> <p73wupuq34l.fsf@oldwotan.suse.de>
	<20020909162050.B4781@q.mn.rr.com>
	<5.1.0.14.2.20020910190828.00b27258@pop.gmx.net> 
	<20020910142347.A5000@q.mn.rr.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 
Date: 10 Sep 2002 15:29:17 -0400
Message-Id: <1031686158.945.11.camel@phantasy>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, 2002-09-10 at 15:23, Shawn wrote:

> If this is correct, could I then make the assumption that merging XFS
> would be minimally impactful for those kernel user who do not enable it?

Yes, and I think it will go in.  It has just not made it passed Linus's
filters yet, but it will - hch knows what he is doing.

	Robert Love