From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 13 Sep 2002 19:22:02 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 13 Sep 2002 19:22:01 -0400 Received: from AMontpellier-205-1-13-198.abo.wanadoo.fr ([80.14.68.198]:39043 "EHLO awak") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id convert rfc822-to-8bit; Fri, 13 Sep 2002 19:22:01 -0400 Subject: Re: Good way to free as much memory as possible under 2.5.34? From: Xavier Bestel To: Rik van Riel Cc: Pavel Machek , Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 Date: 14 Sep 2002 01:26:48 +0200 Message-Id: <1031959608.20072.23.camel@bip> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Le sam 14/09/2002 à 00:42, Rik van Riel a écrit : > On 13 Sep 2002, Xavier Bestel wrote: > > Le ven 13/09/2002 à 23:33, Rik van Riel a écrit : > > > > > I suspect only very few people will use swsuspend, so it should > > > not be intrusive. > > > > I don't think so. > > You think many people will use it, or you think swsuspend > should be intrusive and have code in all other kernel > subsystems ? ;) I think people will use it. Either for laptops (when ACPI support will match APM) or for desktop. Personnaly I'd use it for both if it were functionnal.