From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 26 Sep 2002 23:21:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 26 Sep 2002 23:21:30 -0400 Received: from c16598.thoms1.vic.optusnet.com.au ([210.49.243.217]:16575 "HELO pc.kolivas.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 26 Sep 2002 23:21:29 -0400 Message-ID: <1033097205.3d93cff5703ac@kolivas.net> Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 13:26:45 +1000 From: Con Kolivas To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [BENCHMARK] 2.4.20-pre8 contest results MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Here are the contest (http://contest.kolivas.net) results for 2.4.20-pre8 compared to previous kernels. noload: Kernel Time CPU Ratio 2.4.19 70.42 99% 1.00 2.4.20-pre7 70.37 99% 1.00 2.4.20-pre8 70.47 99% 1.00 process_load: Kernel Time CPU Ratio 2.4.19 85.21 80% 1.21 2.4.20-pre7 86.02 80% 1.22 2.4.20-pre8 86.65 80% 1.23 io_load: Kernel Time CPU Ratio 2.4.19 165.56 45% 2.35 2.4.20-pre7 195.32 38% 2.77 2.4.20-pre8 167.14 45% 2.37 mem_load: Kernel Time CPU Ratio 2.4.19 100.70 76% 1.43 2.4.20-pre7 102.83 75% 1.46 2.4.20-pre8 102.14 76% 1.45 There's no significant change since 2.4.19 which is what we'd expect. Con.