From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S262638AbSI0Wcu>; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 18:32:50 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S262639AbSI0Wcu>; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 18:32:50 -0400
Received: from pc1-cwma1-5-cust51.swa.cable.ntl.com ([80.5.120.51]:58361 "EHLO
	irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S262638AbSI0Wcs>; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 18:32:48 -0400
Subject: Re: 2.5.38: modular IDE broken
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Bob_Tracy <rct@gherkin.frus.com>
Cc: Kai Germaschewski <kai-germaschewski@uiowa.edu>,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <m17v1rZ-0005khC@gherkin.frus.com>
References: <m17v1rZ-0005khC@gherkin.frus.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-10) 
Date: 27 Sep 2002 23:41:36 +0100
Message-Id: <1033166496.17717.0.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, 2002-09-27 at 21:37, Bob_Tracy wrote:
> Understood.  My position is simply that I noted something broken, and
> I reported it during the development cycle.  Would you prefer that I
> had waited until after 2.5.X became 2.6?  I didn't think so...  I was
> not (and am not) presuming to dictate what any developer's priorities
> should be.

Nod.. its just I've had lots of equally helpful reports 8)