From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 10:46:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 10:46:35 -0400 Received: from pc1-cwma1-5-cust51.swa.cable.ntl.com ([80.5.120.51]:57329 "EHLO irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 10:46:34 -0400 Subject: Re: v2.6 vs v3.0 From: Alan Cox To: Jens Axboe Cc: jbradford@dial.pipex.com, Linus Torvalds , jdickens@ameritech.net, mingo@elte.hu, jgarzik@pobox.com, kessler@us.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, saw@saw.sw.com.sg, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, richardj_moore@uk.ibm.com, andre@master.linux-ide.org In-Reply-To: <20020929091229.GA1014@suse.de> References: <200209290716.g8T7GNwf000562@darkstar.example.net> <20020929091229.GA1014@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-10) Date: 29 Sep 2002 15:56:40 +0100 Message-Id: <1033311400.13001.5.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 2002-09-29 at 10:12, Jens Axboe wrote: > 2.5 is definitely desktop stable, so please test it if you can. Until > recently there was a personal show stopper for me, the tasklist > deadline. Now 2.5 is happily running on my desktop as well. Its very hard to make that assessment when the audio layer still doesnt work, most scsi drivers havent been ported, most other drivers are full of 2.4 fixed problems and so on. Most of my boxes won't even run a 2.5 tree yet. I'm sure its hardly unique. Middle of November we may begin to find out how solid the core code actually is, as drivers get fixed up and also in the other direction as we eliminate numerous crashes caused by "fixed in 2.4" bugs