From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 08:45:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 08:45:33 -0400 Received: from pc1-cwma1-5-cust51.swa.cable.ntl.com ([80.5.120.51]:56826 "EHLO irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 08:45:32 -0400 Subject: Re: [patch] smptimers, old BH removal, tq-cleanup, 2.5.39 From: Alan Cox To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Dipankar Sarma , "David S. Miller" , mingo@elte.hu, Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, wli@holomorphy.com, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru In-Reply-To: <20020930043829.GG9920@conectiva.com.br> References: <20020930004559.A19071@in.ibm.com> <20020929.172022.23984844.davem@redhat.com> <20020930100317.A21939@in.ibm.com> <20020930043829.GG9920@conectiva.com.br> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-10) Date: 30 Sep 2002 13:55:56 +0100 Message-Id: <1033390556.16266.36.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2002-09-30 at 05:38, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > I'm working on Appletalk, will be fixed after X.25, humm, in fact Appletalk > only uses SNAP on Ethernet, so it is only broken for ppptalk and ltalk, does > anybody still uses these later two? ppptalk is relevant to the modern world, localtalk is basically for talking to old macintoshes many of which don't have any capability for ethernet. I don't think either of them are even going to be performance matters. > Nobody working on this, as far as I know > > econet/af_econet.c Ancient BBC micro protocol, could probably be done just as well in user space. Alan