From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
Cc: bunk@fs.tum.de, jochen@scram.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.3.39 compile errors on Alpha
Date: 30 Sep 2002 14:15:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1033391751.16468.51.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020930.052555.123500588.davem@redhat.com>
On Mon, 2002-09-30 at 13:25, David S. Miller wrote:
> From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
> Date: 30 Sep 2002 13:35:40 +0100
>
> Is this actually safe - suppose the machine has no tsc counter (eg old
> x86 or indeed new x86 numa, speedstep using, etc). In that case
> do_gettimeofday doesn't appear to be either IRQ safe or fast enough to
> use in this way ?
>
> This is how netif_rx() has worked for a long time. ATM is just
> copying the input packet logic.
>
> So why are you complaining now? :-)
Because I was looking over the gettimeoffset code and forgot that
gettimeofday itself takes the xtime_lock 8)
Alan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-09-30 13:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-09-30 7:46 2.3.39 compile errors on Alpha Jochen Friedrich
2002-09-30 7:59 ` Jochen Friedrich
2002-09-30 11:08 ` Adrian Bunk
2002-09-30 12:35 ` Alan Cox
2002-09-30 12:25 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-30 13:15 ` Alan Cox [this message]
2002-09-30 13:20 ` 2.5.39 XConfig Processor Detection Adam Voigt
2002-09-30 13:30 ` Dave Jones
2002-09-30 13:48 ` Adam Voigt
2002-09-30 20:39 ` 2.3.39 compile errors on Alpha David S. Miller
2002-09-30 17:58 ` 2.3.39 LLC on Alpha broken? Jochen Friedrich
2002-09-30 18:07 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2002-09-30 8:04 ` Jochen Friedrich
2002-09-30 21:04 ` Jochen Friedrich
2002-10-01 14:46 ` Ivan Kokshaysky
2002-10-01 16:05 ` Falk Hueffner
2002-09-30 20:59 ` David S. Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1033391751.16468.51.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk \
--to=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=bunk@fs.tum.de \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=jochen@scram.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).