From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 1 Oct 2002 08:48:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 1 Oct 2002 08:48:32 -0400 Received: from node-d-1ef6.a2000.nl ([62.195.30.246]:22510 "EHLO localhost.localdomain") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 1 Oct 2002 08:48:31 -0400 Subject: Re: Adpter card read old memory value From: Arjan van de Ven To: Eitan Ben-Nun Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Uri Lublin In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-UrWzuP2Im5WQoHZ1oj21" X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-10) Date: 01 Oct 2002 14:56:47 +0200 Message-Id: <1033477007.2672.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --=-UrWzuP2Im5WQoHZ1oj21 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2002-10-01 at 14:43, Eitan Ben-Nun wrote: > This seems like a cache coherency problem:=20 > An adapter card on the pci bus send a message to pc i386 Linux to update = a memory address.=20 > Then it reads the address and sees an old value, even though the pc cpu h= ave performed an update to this memory address.=20 uhm your report is missing a pointer to the source of the driver so nobody can help you by looking at what's going on.... --=-UrWzuP2Im5WQoHZ1oj21 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA9mZuPxULwo51rQBIRAmV9AJ0XmXUea2FvQTZ4OBH0bFki+h1ItQCdEPXw gvQx178wdGYYOh8Zh1y2asI= =i8tm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-UrWzuP2Im5WQoHZ1oj21--