linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Hohnbaum <hohnbaum@us.ibm.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Erich Focht <efocht@ess.nec.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Simple NUMA scheduler patch
Date: 02 Oct 2002 15:08:39 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1033596520.24872.48.camel@dyn9-47-17-164.beaverton.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20021002141121.C2141@infradead.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2282 bytes --]

Christoph,

Thanks for the feedback.  I've made the suggested changes and rolled
a new patch.  Also, upped the threshold to move a task between nodes
based on results from a test Erich provided.  This seems to have helped
both on Erich's test and on kernbench.  Latest kernbench numbers:

Averages of 10 runs each:

stock-2.5.40      numa_sched-2.5.40a

real 0m34.181s    0m32.533s
user 5m11.986s    4m50.662s
sys  2m11.267     2m4.677s

I need to test this patch on a non-NUMA box to ensure that the
NUMA changes in find_busies_queue() don't affect SMP.  That 
testing will take place this week.

             Michael

On Wed, 2002-10-02 at 06:11, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 04:55:35PM -0700, Michael Hohnbaum wrote:
> > --- clean-2.5.40/kernel/sched.c	Tue Oct  1 13:48:34 2002
> > +++ linux-2.5.40/kernel/sched.c	Tue Oct  1 13:27:46 2002
> > @@ -30,6 +30,9 @@
> >  #include <linux/notifier.h>
> >  #include <linux/delay.h>
> >  #include <linux/timer.h>
> > +#if CONFIG_NUMA
> > +#include <asm/topology.h>
> > +#endif
> 
> Please make this inlcude unconditional, okay?
> 
> > +/*
> > + * find_busiest_queue - find the busiest runqueue.
> > + */
> > +static inline runqueue_t *find_busiest_queue(runqueue_t *this_rq, int this_cpu, int idle, int *imbalance)
> > +{
> > +	int nr_running, load, max_load_on_node, max_load_off_node, i;
> > +	runqueue_t *busiest, *busiest_on_node, *busiest_off_node, *rq_src;
> 
> You're new find_busiest_queue is to 80 or 90% the same as the non-NUMA one.
> At least add the #ifdefs only where needed, but as cpu_to_node() optimizes
> away for the non-NUMA case I think you could just make it unconditional.
> 
> > +		if (__cpu_to_node(i) == __cpu_to_node(this_cpu)) {
> 
> I think it should be cpu_to_node, not __cpu_to_node.
> 
> > +#if CONFIG_NUMA
> > +/*
> > + * If dest_cpu is allowed for this process, migrate the task to it.
> > + * This is accomplished by forcing the cpu_allowed mask to only
> > + * allow dest_cpu, which will force the cpu onto dest_cpu.  Then
> > + * the cpu_allowed mask is restored.
> > + */
> > +void sched_migrate_task(task_t *p, int dest_cpu)
> 
> Looks like this one could be static?
> 
-- 

Michael Hohnbaum                      503-578-5486
hohnbaum@us.ibm.com                   T/L 775-5486

[-- Attachment #2: sched40a.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 6960 bytes --]

--- clean-2.5.40/kernel/sched.c	Wed Oct  2 10:41:45 2002
+++ linux-2.5.40/kernel/sched.c	Wed Oct  2 13:27:42 2002
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
 #include <linux/notifier.h>
 #include <linux/delay.h>
 #include <linux/timer.h>
+#include <asm/topology.h>
 
 /*
  * Convert user-nice values [ -20 ... 0 ... 19 ]
@@ -637,15 +638,35 @@ static inline unsigned int double_lock_b
  */
 static inline runqueue_t *find_busiest_queue(runqueue_t *this_rq, int this_cpu, int idle, int *imbalance)
 {
-	int nr_running, load, max_load, i;
-	runqueue_t *busiest, *rq_src;
+	int nr_running, load, max_load_on_node, max_load_off_node, i;
+	runqueue_t *busiest, *busiest_on_node, *busiest_off_node, *rq_src;
 
 	/*
-	 * We search all runqueues to find the most busy one.
+	 * This routine is designed to work on NUMA systems.  For
+	 * non-NUMA systems, everything ends up being on the same
+	 * node and most of the NUMA specific logic is optimized
+	 * away by the compiler.
+	 * 
+	 * We must look at each runqueue to update prev_nr_running.
+	 * As we do so, we find the busiest runqueue on the same
+	 * node, and the busiest runqueue off the node.  After
+	 * determining the busiest from each we first see if the
+	 * busiest runqueue on node meets the imbalance criteria.
+	 * If not, then we check the off queue runqueue.  Note that
+	 * we require a higher level of imbalance for choosing an
+	 * off node runqueue.
+	 *
+	 * For off-node, we only move at most one process, so imbalance
+	 * is always set to one for off-node runqueues.
+	 * 
 	 * We do this lockless to reduce cache-bouncing overhead,
 	 * we re-check the 'best' source CPU later on again, with
 	 * the lock held.
 	 *
+	 * Note that this routine is called with the current runqueue
+	 * locked, and if a runqueue is found (return != NULL), then
+	 * that runqueue is returned locked, also.
+	 *
 	 * We fend off statistical fluctuations in runqueue lengths by
 	 * saving the runqueue length during the previous load-balancing
 	 * operation and using the smaller one the current and saved lengths.
@@ -666,9 +687,15 @@ static inline runqueue_t *find_busiest_q
 		nr_running = this_rq->nr_running;
 	else
 		nr_running = this_rq->prev_nr_running[this_cpu];
+	if (nr_running < 1)
+		nr_running = 1;
 
+	busiest_on_node = NULL;
+	busiest_off_node = NULL;
 	busiest = NULL;
-	max_load = 1;
+	max_load_on_node = 1;
+	max_load_off_node = 1;
+	
 	for (i = 0; i < NR_CPUS; i++) {
 		if (!cpu_online(i))
 			continue;
@@ -678,35 +705,49 @@ static inline runqueue_t *find_busiest_q
 			load = rq_src->nr_running;
 		else
 			load = this_rq->prev_nr_running[i];
+
 		this_rq->prev_nr_running[i] = rq_src->nr_running;
 
-		if ((load > max_load) && (rq_src != this_rq)) {
-			busiest = rq_src;
-			max_load = load;
+		if (__cpu_to_node(i) == __cpu_to_node(this_cpu)) {
+			if ((load > max_load_on_node) && (rq_src != this_rq)) {
+				busiest_on_node = rq_src;
+				max_load_on_node = load;
+			}
+		} else {
+			if (load > max_load_off_node)  {
+				busiest_off_node = rq_src;
+				max_load_off_node = load;
+			}
 		}
 	}
-
-	if (likely(!busiest))
-		goto out;
-
-	*imbalance = (max_load - nr_running) / 2;
-
-	/* It needs an at least ~25% imbalance to trigger balancing. */
-	if (!idle && (*imbalance < (max_load + 3)/4)) {
-		busiest = NULL;
-		goto out;
+	if (busiest_on_node) {
+		/* on node balancing happens if there is > 125% difference */
+		if (idle || ((nr_running*5)/4 < max_load_on_node)) {
+			busiest = busiest_on_node;
+			*imbalance = (max_load_on_node - nr_running) / 2;
+		}
 	}
-
-	nr_running = double_lock_balance(this_rq, busiest, this_cpu, idle, nr_running);
-	/*
-	 * Make sure nothing changed since we checked the
-	 * runqueue length.
-	 */
-	if (busiest->nr_running <= nr_running + 1) {
-		spin_unlock(&busiest->lock);
-		busiest = NULL;
+	if (busiest_off_node && !busiest) {
+		/* off node balancing requires 200% difference */
+		if (nr_running*4 >= max_load_off_node) 
+			return NULL;
+		busiest = busiest_off_node; 
+		*imbalance = 1;
+	} 
+	if (busiest) {
+		if (busiest == this_rq) {
+			return NULL;
+		}
+		nr_running = double_lock_balance(this_rq, busiest, this_cpu, idle, nr_running);
+		/*
+		 * Make sure nothing changed since we checked the
+		 * runqueue length.
+		 */
+		if (busiest->nr_running <= nr_running) {
+			spin_unlock(&busiest->lock);
+			busiest = NULL;
+		}
 	}
-out:
 	return busiest;
 }
 
@@ -2104,6 +2145,65 @@ __init int migration_init(void)
 spinlock_t kernel_flag __cacheline_aligned_in_smp = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED;
 #endif
 
+#if CONFIG_NUMA
+/*
+ * If dest_cpu is allowed for this process, migrate the task to it.
+ * This is accomplished by forcing the cpu_allowed mask to only
+ * allow dest_cpu, which will force the cpu onto dest_cpu.  Then
+ * the cpu_allowed mask is restored.
+ */
+static void sched_migrate_task(task_t *p, int dest_cpu)
+{
+	unsigned long old_mask;
+
+	old_mask = p->cpus_allowed;
+	if (!(old_mask & (1UL << dest_cpu)))
+		return;
+	/* force the process onto the specified CPU */
+	set_cpus_allowed(p, 1UL << dest_cpu);
+
+	/* restore the cpus allowed mask */
+	set_cpus_allowed(p, old_mask);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Find the least loaded CPU.  If the current runqueue is short enough
+ * just use it.
+ */
+static int sched_best_cpu(struct task_struct *p)
+{
+	int i, minload, best_cpu;
+	best_cpu = task_cpu(p);
+	
+	minload = cpu_rq(best_cpu)->nr_running;
+	/* if the current runqueue is only 2 long, don't look elsewhere */
+	if (minload <= 2)
+		return best_cpu;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < NR_CPUS; i++) {
+		if (!cpu_online(i))
+			continue;
+
+		if (minload > cpu_rq(i)->nr_running) {
+			minload = cpu_rq(i)->nr_running;
+			best_cpu = i;
+		}
+	}
+	return best_cpu;
+}
+
+void sched_balance_exec(void)
+{
+	int new_cpu;
+
+	if (numnodes > 1) {
+		new_cpu = sched_best_cpu(current);
+		if (new_cpu != smp_processor_id())
+			sched_migrate_task(current, new_cpu);
+	}
+}
+#endif /* CONFIG_NUMA */
+
 extern void init_timers(void);
 
 void __init sched_init(void)
--- clean-2.5.40/fs/exec.c	Wed Oct  2 10:42:35 2002
+++ linux-2.5.40/fs/exec.c	Tue Oct  1 12:55:50 2002
@@ -1001,6 +1001,8 @@ int do_execve(char * filename, char ** a
 	int retval;
 	int i;
 
+	sched_balance_exec();
+
 	file = open_exec(filename);
 
 	retval = PTR_ERR(file);
--- clean-2.5.40/include/linux/sched.h	Wed Oct  2 10:42:22 2002
+++ linux-2.5.40/include/linux/sched.h	Tue Oct  1 12:55:51 2002
@@ -166,6 +166,11 @@ extern void update_one_process(struct ta
 			       unsigned long system, int cpu);
 extern void scheduler_tick(int user_tick, int system);
 extern unsigned long cache_decay_ticks;
+#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
+extern void sched_balance_exec(void);
+#else
+#define sched_balance_exec() {}
+#endif
 
 
 #define	MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT	LONG_MAX

  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-10-02 22:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <Pine.LNX.4.44.0209050905180.8086-100000@localhost.localdomain>
2002-10-01 23:55 ` [RFC] Simple NUMA scheduler patch Michael Hohnbaum
2002-10-02 13:11   ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-10-02 18:56     ` Matthew Dobson
2002-10-02 22:08     ` Michael Hohnbaum [this message]
2002-10-02 17:54   ` Erich Focht
2002-10-02 18:26     ` Michael Hohnbaum
2002-10-02 18:30     ` Michael Hohnbaum
2002-10-02 20:25     ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-10-05 22:32       ` Erich Focht
2002-10-07 23:37         ` Michael Hohnbaum
2002-10-14 17:19           ` Erich Focht

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1033596520.24872.48.camel@dyn9-47-17-164.beaverton.ibm.com \
    --to=hohnbaum@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=efocht@ess.nec.de \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).