From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S263254AbSJCM0C>; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 08:26:02 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S263256AbSJCM0C>; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 08:26:02 -0400
Received: from pc1-cwma1-5-cust51.swa.cable.ntl.com ([80.5.120.51]:10224 "EHLO
	irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S263254AbSJCM0B>; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 08:26:01 -0400
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove LVM from 2.5 (resend)
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Michael Clark <michael@metaparadigm.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@math.psu.edu>, Andreas Dilger <adilger@clusterfs.com>,
       Lars Marowsky-Bree <lmb@suse.de>,
       Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <3D9BDA8D.5080700@metaparadigm.com>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0210021922200.13480-100000@weyl.math.psu.edu> 
	<3D9BDA8D.5080700@metaparadigm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-10) 
Date: 03 Oct 2002 13:38:50 +0100
Message-Id: <1033648730.28022.8.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, 2002-10-03 at 06:50, Michael Clark wrote:
> > ... and you don't need EVMS for that.
> 
> But EVMS would be an excellent substitute in the mean time.
> 
> Better to having something excellent now than something perfect but
> too late.

You can see who around here has maintained kernel code and who hasnt.
You don't want a substitute in the mean time, because then you have to
get rid of it