On Fri, 2002-10-04 at 01:06, Brian F. G. Bidulock wrote:
> Alan,
> 
> Would it be possible to put a secondary call table behind
> the call gate wrappered in sys_ni_syscall that a module
> could register against. 
Why ?
Adding "unknown" syscalls is I doubt EVER a good idea.
LiS has *known* and *official* syscalls, they can easily live with a
stub like nfsd uses.... few lines of code and it's safe.

Greetings,
   Arjan van de Ven