From: Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@redhat.com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>,
rth@twiddle.net, jakub@redhat.com, torvalds@transmeta.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use __attribute__((malloc)) for gcc 3.2
Date: 07 Oct 2002 13:07:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1033988869.2815.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20021007105622.GA24530@averell>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 854 bytes --]
On Mon, 2002-10-07 at 12:56, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 12:29:00PM +0200, David S. Miller wrote:
> > From: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
> > Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 03:05:41 -0700
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 29, 2002 at 04:01:13PM -0400, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > Does this matter when the kernel is compiled with -fno-strict-aliasing?
> >
> > Yes. The malloc attribute uses REG_NOALIAS, not alias sets.
> >
> > Great, I'm all for Andi's patch in that case.
>
> I retested it on gcc 3.2 and it unfortunately doesn't make any difference
> (resulting kernel is byte-for-byte identical). So it looks like with
> current gcc it isn't worth the effort.
I'm still in favor of doing it, even if it's just to break the
chick-and-egg deadlock that such issues can have.
Greetings,
Arjan van de Ven
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-07 10:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-09-29 15:27 [PATCH] Use __attribute__((malloc)) for gcc 3.2 Andi Kleen
2002-09-29 16:24 ` Adrian Bunk
2002-09-29 17:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-09-30 0:11 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-30 0:29 ` Andi Kleen
2002-09-29 20:01 ` Jakub Jelinek
2002-09-30 0:04 ` Andi Kleen
2002-10-07 10:05 ` Richard Henderson
2002-10-07 10:29 ` David S. Miller
2002-10-07 10:56 ` Andi Kleen
2002-10-07 11:07 ` Arjan van de Ven [this message]
2002-10-07 11:45 ` Richard Henderson
2002-10-07 12:27 ` Andi Kleen
2002-09-29 23:51 ` Anton Blanchard
2002-09-30 0:31 ` Andi Kleen
2002-09-30 1:07 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-10-02 13:46 ` Pavel Machek
[not found] <20020929152731.GA10631@averell.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <20020929182643.C8564@infradead.org.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2002-09-29 19:09 ` Andi Kleen
2002-09-29 20:20 ` Adrian Bunk
2002-09-30 0:21 ` David S. Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1033988869.2815.5.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=arjanv@redhat.com \
--cc=ak@muc.de \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=jakub@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).