From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S261843AbSJNGzI>; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 02:55:08 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S261844AbSJNGzI>; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 02:55:08 -0400
Received: from AGrenoble-101-1-1-171.abo.wanadoo.fr ([193.251.23.171]:51602
	"EHLO awak") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S261843AbSJNGzI> convert rfc822-to-8bit;
	Mon, 14 Oct 2002 02:55:08 -0400
Subject: Re: Bitkeeper outragem, old and new
From: Xavier Bestel <xavier.bestel@free.fr>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
Cc: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>,
       Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L.0210132057430.22735-100000@imladris.surriel.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44L.0210132057430.22735-100000@imladris.surriel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 
Date: 14 Oct 2002 09:00:50 +0200
Message-Id: <1034578850.907.2.camel@bip>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Le lun 14/10/2002 à 01:00, Rik van Riel a écrit :
> On Sun, 13 Oct 2002, Richard Stallman wrote:
> 
> > If the latest outrage brings the spirit of the non-free Bitkeeper
> > license into clear view, perhaps that will be enough to convince the
> > developers of Linux to stop using Bitkeeper for Linux development.
> 
> What would be even better is if it convinced free software people
> to develop a tool as good as, or better than, Bitkeeper.
> 
> Until such a tool exists I'll tolerate Bitkeeper's licensing, since
> my use of bitkeeper seems to increase rather than decrease the amount
> of free software that's available.

Maybe we should start using Intel's compiler in place of gcc for x86
arch ? After all there's no such good free compiler ..