From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 16:40:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 16:40:29 -0400 Received: from netline-be1.netline.ch ([195.141.226.32]:28164 "EHLO netline-be1.netline.ch") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id convert rfc822-to-8bit; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 16:40:27 -0400 Subject: Re: [Linux-fbdev-devel] fbdev changes. From: Michel =?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E4nzer?= To: James Simmons Cc: Linus Torvalds , Linux Fbdev development list , Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 Date: 14 Oct 2002 22:46:17 +0200 Message-Id: <1034628378.1143.507.camel@tibook> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Son, 2002-10-13 at 22:27, James Simmons wrote: > > The final changes to the fbdev layer are at hand. One of the last > changes I wanted to purpose was to create a console driectory in > drivers/video and move all console related stuff into that directory. > The next step was to move the dri stuff into that directory with the agp > code possible. The questions I have is should we move the agp code over to > that directory. Should the DRI code move over directly or should we move > DRI driver specific code into the same directory as the fbdev driver > directories? For example in aty directory we have all the ati framebuffer > and ATI dri code. What do you think? Wouldn't that complicate merges between the kernel and DRI CVS? At any rate, I think discussion related to the DRI should take place on dri-devel. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper)/ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) developer XFree86 and DRI project member / CS student, Free Software enthusiast