From: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
To: Matt <colpatch@us.ibm.com>
Cc: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, LSE Tech <lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au>,
Michael Hohnbaum <hohnbaum@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [rfc][patch] Memory Binding API v0.3 2.5.41
Date: 14 Oct 2002 17:55:53 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1034643354.19094.149.camel@cog> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3DAB6385.9000207@us.ibm.com>
On Mon, 2002-10-14 at 17:38, Matthew Dobson wrote:
> Also, right now, memblks map to nodes in a straightforward manner (1-1
> on NUMA-Q, the only architecture that has defined them). It will likely
> look the same on most architectures, too.
Just an FYI: I believe the x440 breaks this assumption.
There are 2 chunks on the first CEC. The current discontig patch for it
has to drop the second chunk (anything over 3.5G on the first CEC) in
order to work w/ the existing code. However, that will probably need to
be addressed at some point, so be aware that this might affect you as
well.
thanks
-john
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-15 1:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-10 1:12 [rfc][patch] Memory Binding API v0.3 2.5.41 Matthew Dobson
2002-10-10 3:05 ` Andrew Morton
2002-10-10 18:29 ` Matthew Dobson
2002-10-10 4:06 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-10-10 18:43 ` Matthew Dobson
2002-10-10 9:00 ` Arjan van de Ven
2002-10-10 18:55 ` Matthew Dobson
2002-10-10 10:06 ` Arjan van de Ven
2002-10-10 11:22 ` Alan Cox
2002-10-10 11:28 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-10-10 19:09 ` Matthew Dobson
2002-10-10 19:06 ` Matthew Dobson
2002-10-10 19:01 ` Matthew Dobson
2002-10-13 22:22 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-10-15 0:14 ` Matthew Dobson
2002-10-15 0:20 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-10-15 0:38 ` Matthew Dobson
2002-10-15 0:43 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-10-15 0:51 ` Matthew Dobson
2002-10-15 0:58 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-10-15 0:55 ` john stultz [this message]
2002-10-15 1:08 ` [Lse-tech] " Martin J. Bligh
2002-10-15 1:20 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-10-15 1:29 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-10-15 1:40 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-10-15 1:57 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-10-15 1:08 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-10-15 1:16 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-10-15 17:21 ` Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1034643354.19094.149.camel@cog \
--to=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@zip.com.au \
--cc=colpatch@us.ibm.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=hohnbaum@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=mbligh@aracnet.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).