From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 15 Oct 2002 00:33:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 15 Oct 2002 00:33:56 -0400 Received: from bgp01116664bgs.westln01.mi.comcast.net ([68.42.104.18]:56680 "HELO blackmagik.dynup.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 15 Oct 2002 00:33:55 -0400 Subject: Re: Patch: linux-2.5.42/kernel/sys.c - warm reboot should not suspend devices From: Eric Blade To: "Eric W. Biederman" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: References: <200210132359.QAA01092@adam.yggdrasil.com> <1034573925.2786.55.camel@cpq> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8.99 Date: 15 Oct 2002 00:34:14 -0400 Message-Id: <1034656454.2786.117.camel@cpq> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2002-10-14 at 11:28, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > > SUSPEND_POWER_DOWN as defined should actually cause the behavior Adam > was seeing. Which made it doubly interesting. > > Will you submit a patch detangling this mess? I believe Adams > only problem was that it did not obviously fix his problem. > Submitted earlier last night. subj: Patch: linux-2.5.42/drivers/base/power.c - add state for SHUT_DOWN Cheers, - Eric