From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 15 Oct 2002 00:47:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 15 Oct 2002 00:47:56 -0400 Received: from bgp01116664bgs.westln01.mi.comcast.net ([68.42.104.18]:62056 "HELO blackmagik.dynup.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 15 Oct 2002 00:47:56 -0400 Subject: Re: Evolution and 2.5.x From: Eric Blade To: Thomas Molina Cc: Andy Pfiffer , Robert Love , Eric Blade , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8.99 Date: 15 Oct 2002 00:48:16 -0400 Message-Id: <1034657296.1121.121.camel@cpq> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2002-10-14 at 15:41, Thomas Molina wrote: > I've read this thread and I'm confused. Is this seen as a problem with > Evolution, ORBit, or the 2.5 kernel? If it is seen as a possible kernel > problem, I'll add it to my problem report status page and track it. If I > track it, Eric Blade will get a weekly email asking whether he's still > seeing the problem, at least until I'm told to drop it, or no one > responds. I'm fairly well confused, as well. I don't know if it's kernel, or Evolution, or ORBit. The Evolution people don't seem to care all that much - it's broken, it's a development kernel, they'll straighten it out later. *shrug* I don't see much point to getting a weekly email about it, if no one's working on the problem? I don't understand anywhere near enough to look into it. - Eric