Re: Bugzilla bug tracking database for 2.5 now available.

From: Paul Larson <plars@linuxtestproject.org>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: mailing-lists@digitaleric.net,
	"Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Bugzilla bug tracking database for 2.5 now available.
Date: 15 Nov 2002 09:41:11 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1037374874.10626.133.camel@plars> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1037373320.19987.23.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 911 bytes --]

On Fri, 2002-11-15 at 09:15, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Fri, 2002-11-15 at 02:53, Eric Northup wrote:
> > Would this be an appropriate use of the "version" tag in Bugzilla?  Currently 
> > the only choice is "2.5", but if that were renamed to "2.5-linus", then the 
> > other heavily used patchsets could be monitored while making it easy for 
> > people who only want to see bugs in Linus' tree.
> 
> That works for me. Create a 2.5-ac product that is assigned to me. I can
> then reassign them all to DaveM as appropriate
I think this is an excellent idea.  It shouldn't require much effort to
get bugs directed to the people would would be most likely to care about
it.  That was my thinking when I suggested the "send a one time copy of
this bug report to <email address>".  If the right person is already set
up to get the report though, this feature wouldn't be needed (as often).

-Paul Larson

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 240 bytes --]