From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 12 Jan 2003 10:49:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 12 Jan 2003 10:49:40 -0500 Received: from pc2-cwma1-4-cust86.swan.cable.ntl.com ([213.105.254.86]:5782 "EHLO irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 12 Jan 2003 10:49:39 -0500 Subject: Re: Intel And Kenrel Programming (was: Nvidia is a great company) From: Alan Cox To: robw@optonline.net Cc: Chuck Wolber , Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <1042382565.848.11.camel@RobsPC.RobertWilkens.com> References: <1042382565.848.11.camel@RobsPC.RobertWilkens.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: Message-Id: <1042389923.15051.1.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.1 (1.2.1-2) Date: 12 Jan 2003 16:45:24 +0000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 2003-01-12 at 14:42, Rob Wilkens wrote: > Ignorring the well popularized floating point bug in the pentium, to > which there was a bug, are there many other bugs you run accross in the > pentium while kernel programming? There are actually very few chips we don't have to deal with some kind of errata on, and the newer more complex chips generally have the larger collections of errata. One thing that has been helpful is the microcode update stuff Intel did, we hit few bugs that up to date microcode kill off