From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 10 Feb 2003 17:35:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 10 Feb 2003 17:35:57 -0500 Received: from pc-80-195-34-144-ed.blueyonder.co.uk ([80.195.34.144]:64649 "EHLO sisko.scot.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 10 Feb 2003 17:35:55 -0500 Subject: Re: [Ext2-devel] Re: fsck out of memory From: "Stephen C. Tweedie" To: Stephan van Hienen Cc: Andreas Dilger , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, "Theodore Ts'o" , peter@chubb.wattle.id.au, tbm@a2000.nu In-Reply-To: References: <20030207102858.P18636@schatzie.adilger.int> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-11james) Date: 10 Feb 2003 22:44:20 +0000 Message-Id: <1044917060.11838.108.camel@sisko.scot.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Sun, 2003-02-09 at 10:08, Stephan van Hienen wrote: > Feb 7 04:18:15 storage kernel: EXT3-fs error (device md(9,0)): > ext3_new_block: > Allocating block in system zone - block = 536875638 That looks like it could be a block wrap, amongst other possible causes. > makes me wonder if this can have todo with the lbd (to allow 2TB+ devices) > patch ? or is this something else? Well, that's the most likely candidate, because it's the least tested component. Are you using Ben LaHaise's LBD fixes for the md devices? Without those, md and lvm are not LBD-safe. Cheers, Stephen