From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161076AbbBCVcB (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Feb 2015 16:32:01 -0500 Received: from v094114.home.net.pl ([79.96.170.134]:63399 "HELO v094114.home.net.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S932131AbbBCVb7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Feb 2015 16:31:59 -0500 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Jiang Liu Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Bjorn Helgaas , Yinghai Lu , Borislav Petkov , Lv Zheng , Tony Luck , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Patch v2 00/23] Improve ACPI resource parsing interfaces and enable IOAPIC hotplug Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 22:54:53 +0100 Message-ID: <10471247.hI8hB2sD9x@vostro.rjw.lan> User-Agent: KMail/4.11.5 (Linux/3.16.0-rc5+; KDE/4.11.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <1422844988-13854-1-git-send-email-jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> References: <1422844988-13854-1-git-send-email-jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday, February 02, 2015 10:42:45 AM Jiang Liu wrote: > During enabling ACPI based IOAPIC hotplug, Thomas noticed some issues > in ACPI resource parsing interfaces. So this is an effort to improve them. > > Patch 1 refines ACPICA resource descriptors, which has already been > merged into "git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git bleeding-edge" > > Patch 2-12 improve ACPI resource parsing interfaces and also fixes some > bugs. > > Patch 13-20 try to share the common data structure resource_list_entry > between PCI and ACPI. It may also be shared with PNP too. > > Patch 21-23 enable ACPI based IOAPIC hotplug. > > The patchset is based on v3.19-rc6+ and passed Fengguang's 0day test > suite. You may get it from: > https://github.com/jiangliu/linux.git acpires_v2 Patch [1/23] has been in linux-next for a while already. I've just queued up patches [2-20/23] for 3.20. I have some questions to patch [21/23] which I'll ask in a reply to that one. If [22-23/23] do not depend on [21/23] in any way, I can queue them up too, so please let me know if that's the case. Thanks! -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.