From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 10:51:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 10:51:30 -0500 Received: from pc2-cwma1-4-cust86.swan.cable.ntl.com ([213.105.254.86]:48836 "EHLO irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 10:51:29 -0500 Subject: Re: bio too big device From: Alan Cox To: scott-kernel@thomasons.org Cc: Andre Hedrick , axboe@suse.de, Andries Brouwer , Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <200303120854.17410.scott-kernel@thomasons.org> References: <200303120854.17410.scott-kernel@thomasons.org> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: Message-Id: <1047488997.22694.39.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.1 (1.2.1-4) Date: 12 Mar 2003 17:09:58 +0000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2003-03-12 at 14:54, scott thomason wrote: > Just so everyone knows...these aren't ancient drives I'm talking > about. One is a 30GB Maxtor 5T030H3, less than two years old > IIRC, and the other is a 30GB IBM-DTLA-307030 purchased about > six months ago. The conversation drifted ontoa different issue, your drives are fine, in your case you are hitting bugs in the 2.5.x md driver.