From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 1 Apr 2003 10:30:03 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 1 Apr 2003 10:30:02 -0500 Received: from [81.2.110.254] ([81.2.110.254]:32239 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 1 Apr 2003 10:30:01 -0500 Subject: Re: 64-bit kdev_t - just for playing From: Alan Cox To: Roman Zippel Cc: Joel Becker , bert hubert , Greg KH , Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl, Linux Kernel Mailing List , Wim Coekaerts In-Reply-To: References: <1048805732.3953.1.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk> <20030327234820.GE1687@kroah.com> <20030328180545.GG32000@ca-server1.us.oracle.com> <20030331083157.GA29029@outpost.ds9a.nl> <20030331172403.GM32000@ca-server1.us.oracle.com> <1049149133.1287.1.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: Message-Id: <1049208134.19703.12.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 (1.2.2-5) Date: 01 Apr 2003 15:42:24 +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2003-04-01 at 00:42, Roman Zippel wrote: > Hi, > > On 31 Mar 2003, Alan Cox wrote: > > > > 2. What compromises can we make for 2.6? > > > > Defaulting char devices to 256 minors and a lot of space so stuff doesnt > > break. Viro has done the block stuff and we have the scope to do sane > > stuff like /dev/disk/.. for all disks now. > > What do you mean with "a lot of space so stuff doesnt break"? We need to default to 12:20 for char but where the 20 is actually defaulting to 0000xx so we don't get extra minors for any device that hasnt been audited for it > > Glibc already has a bigger dev_t > > and a broken mknod implementation... Easy enough to deal with