From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263494AbTDCTOW (for ); Thu, 3 Apr 2003 14:14:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263497AbTDCTMS (for ); Thu, 3 Apr 2003 14:12:18 -0500 Received: from rth.ninka.net ([216.101.162.244]:33759 "EHLO rth.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263495AbTDCTLm (for ); Thu, 3 Apr 2003 14:11:42 -0500 Subject: From: "David S. Miller" To: root@chaos.analogic.com Cc: Linux kernel In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: Message-Id: <1049397747.12168.1.camel@rth.ninka.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 (1.2.2-5) Date: 03 Apr 2003 11:22:27 -0800 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2003-04-03 at 08:22, Richard B. Johnson wrote: > FYI vger rejects mail sent from yahoo.com, claims that it > has a HTML subpart and considers it spam or Outlook Virus. > > FYI any mail sent from yahoo will end up using the yahoo tools > (qmail). This will put an empty HTML section in all mail. It > is not a good thing to reject this because that means you reject > all mail from yahoo. That's yahoo users problem not ours. If you can't be bothered to get a plain text email out, you shouldn't be using these lists. VGER isn't the only place outright blocking HTML attached emails. -- David S. Miller