From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263398AbTDSRnP (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Apr 2003 13:43:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263401AbTDSRnP (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Apr 2003 13:43:15 -0400 Received: from 205-158-62-136.outblaze.com ([205.158.62.136]:9148 "HELO fs5-4.us4.outblaze.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S263398AbTDSRnO (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Apr 2003 13:43:14 -0400 Subject: Re: Are linux-fs's drive-fault-tolerant by concept? From: Felipe Alfaro Solana To: John Bradford Cc: Stephan von Krawczynski , linux-kernel In-Reply-To: <200304191622.h3JGMI9L000263@81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk> References: <200304191622.h3JGMI9L000263@81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1050774897.595.14.camel@teapot.felipe-alfaro.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.3 (1.2.3-1) Date: 19 Apr 2003 19:54:57 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 2003-04-19 at 18:22, John Bradford wrote: > A RAID-0 array and regular backups are the best way to protect your > data. I assume you meant a RAID-1 or RAID-10 array ;-) -- Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments. See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html Linux Registered User #287198