From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263011AbTDXKmH (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Apr 2003 06:42:07 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263268AbTDXKmH (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Apr 2003 06:42:07 -0400 Received: from 205-158-62-136.outblaze.com ([205.158.62.136]:9135 "HELO fs5-4.us4.outblaze.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S263011AbTDXKmG (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Apr 2003 06:42:06 -0400 Subject: Re: Flame Linus to a crisp! From: Felipe Alfaro Solana To: Clemens Schwaighofer Cc: Linus Torvalds , Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <3EA76FFE.5070007@tequila.co.jp> References: <3EA76FFE.5070007@tequila.co.jp> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1051181644.607.4.camel@teapot.felipe-alfaro.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.3 (1.2.3-1) Date: 24 Apr 2003 12:54:04 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2003-04-24 at 07:02, Clemens Schwaighofer wrote: > > Because signing is (at least right now) the only way to show that you > > trust something. And if you can't show that you trust something, you > can't > > have any real security. > > so should we start to sign all our emails? so we know we trust each other? Can I trust you? Uhmm... Are you really Clemens? Please, prove it with this simply challenge: what was the kernel version that first introduced explicit return codes in drivers for stating that an IRQ was handled? ;-) All of this DRM stuff gives me headaches. -- Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments. See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html Linux Registered User #287198