From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263519AbTDYJUZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Apr 2003 05:20:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263521AbTDYJUZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Apr 2003 05:20:25 -0400 Received: from pc2-cwma1-4-cust86.swan.cable.ntl.com ([213.105.254.86]:8583 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263519AbTDYJUZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Apr 2003 05:20:25 -0400 Subject: re: interrupting connect(), EINTR, EINPROGRESS, EALREADY, and so on From: Alan Cox To: Dan Kegel Cc: david.madore@ens.fr, Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <3EA8CA5E.7030102@kegel.com> References: <3EA8CA5E.7030102@kegel.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: Message-Id: <1051259624.5459.4.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 (1.2.2-5) Date: 25 Apr 2003 09:33:45 +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Gwe, 2003-04-25 at 06:40, Dan Kegel wrote: > David Madore wrote: > > http://www.eleves.ens.fr:8080/home/madore/computers/connect-intr.html > Interesting. > > I'd suggest bringing this up on the austin-group-l list, > see http://www.opengroup.org/austin/lists.html Linux is perhaps a little friendlier but it isnt clear. The socket api drafts have an even more fun bug. For some protocols "bind" is a blocking operation but the API was written by someone who never considered this